Connect with us

Ukraine War

US President Biden Scrambles to Find Money for Ukraine War

Published

on

US President Biden Scrambling to Find Money for Ukraine War

President Joe Biden is currently scrambling to rally backing for a fresh aid package for the war-torn Ukraine, despite Republican pessimism in a bitterly divided Congress. Hardline Republicans pushed through a vote on Tuesday that resulted in the ousting of the party’s own House of Representatives speaker, Joe McCarthy.

What does this mean for Ukraine? Is the United States, the country’s most steadfast ally to date, poised to reduce its massive aid packages? Will others back down, given its role in gathering support across the West?

Recent events, in which Congress abandoned provisions for more funding to avoid a government shutdown, sent shockwaves across the Atlantic. Biden is now urging members of Congress to support a separate agreement for Ukraine assistance. He was banking on McCarthy’s support, which he lost on Tuesday.

McCarthy had already raised members’ concerns about accountability involving cash given to Kyiv prior to his sudden departure. With some of his potential successors strongly in favour of continuing funding and others strongly opposed, who succeeds him could influence the flow of US aid to Ukraine – and potentially the direction of the war that began in February 2022 with Russia’s full-fledged invasion of its eastern neighbour.

In the midst of the bizarre drama, Biden told Congress on October 1 that the “vast majority” of both parties in the Senate and Congress supported Ukraine’s battle against Russia’s “brutal aggression.”

While senators from both parties have showed bipartisanship on the issue, with many attending a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his September visit to Washington, the House is more polarized. Republicans hold a slim 221-212 majority in the chamber.

On Monday, October 2, entrepreneur Elon Musk slammed Kyiv on his X social media platform (previously Twitter), tweeting a meme of Zelenskyy with the caption: “When it’s been 5 minutes and you haven’t asked for a billion dollars in aid.”

Ukraine’s parliament retaliated on its official X account, tweeting a Musk meme with the words: “When it’s been 5 minutes and you haven’t spread Russian propaganda.”

Last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin praised Musk as a “outstanding person” following disclosures that the entrepreneur thwarted a Ukrainian attack on Russian-occupied Crimea last year by ordering the shutdown of his Starlink satellite communications. Musk supposedly feared that Moscow would respond with nuclear weapons.

So far, the United States has been a key supporter of Kyiv, delivering approximately $113 billion in military, humanitarian, and economic help. Military spending, which amounts for more than half of US aid, pays for drones, tanks, and missiles vital to Ukraine’s ongoing fight.

Humanitarian aid delivers medical supplies and necessities such as food and safe drinking water to the displaced population.

Republican opponents of aid believe that the money should be spent on domestic issues such as border security, law and order, and relief for climate-related natural disasters that are becoming more common in the United States.

Ukraine Aide US defence budget

Aid to Ukraine accounts for a sizable portion of the $773 billion defence budget request for 2023. It is significantly more than the $25 billion earmarked for border security this year, a major irritant for conservatives.

Last month, DoD Comptroller Michael McCord attempted to sway McCarthy, arguing that the Pentagon had already reduced its assistance. In a letter dated September 29, he emphasised the impact of foreign security aid on jobs and output in congressional districts, citing facilities in Tuscon, Arizona, and Camden, Arkansas.

The money is running out. According to McCord, the DoD has only $1.6 billion to replenish military stocks moving to Ukraine and only $5.4 billion in Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA). The Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) is now over.

However, as the presidential race heats up, such pleas are likely to go unnoticed. Military assistance is simply not considered a winning political strategy.

Hardline Republicans like Gaetz, a supporter of Donald Trump, who is running for re-election to the White House next year, are ready to continue their anti-aid campaign in the coming months.

The White House said on October 3 that Biden has spoken with the leaders of partner countries about sustaining coordinated support.

Last month, in his annual address to the United Nations General Assembly, Biden attempted to address war fatigue in Europe, particularly in Poland and Slovakia.

“Russia believes that the world will grow weary and allow it to brutalize Ukraine without consequence,” he stated. “But I ask you this: If we abandon the core principles of the United States to appease an aggressor, can any member state in this body feel confident that they’re protected?”

None of this would have surprised Zelenskyy, who is fighting to repel Russian forces before another hard winter arrives. During a visit to Washington last month, he reportedly characterised the situation to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in the harshest of terms.

Ukraine Taking Devastating Casualties

Meanwhile, according to a renowned US defence analyst, Ukraine has lost approximately 40,000 soldiers in the last month since the counteroffensive began, and roughly an equivalent number have been wounded since the war began in February 2022.

The analyst also accused the United States for pulling Kyiv into an unneeded war by continuing to arm it. If the situation worsens, it risks including the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), and Washington is badly equipped to confront Russia militarily in this scenario.

Colonel Douglas Macgregor, a former US Army Armoured Corps officer, claimed this in an interview with Tucker Carlson, a US media figure. Macgregor, a former adviser to President Donald Trump, has been outspokenly critical of US and NATO policy in the war, which he believes inflamed Russia.

He claims that the mainstream media has purposefully concealed Ukraine’s massive losses and Russia’s irreversible advances, military might, and overall strategic solidity.

According to Macgregor’s claims, The EurAsian Times stated in February of this year that Ukraine had 400,000 wounded and 1,57,000 killed. That essay emphasised the socioeconomic factor, where the country’s population losses were severe due to low birth rates in recent years.

As a result, the scenario threatens to precipitate an impending economic crisis. The estimates, however, cannot be independently verified due to Ukraine’s ban on publishing casualty counts and Russia’s typical reticence about revealing the numbers of its losses.
Ukraine’s Counteroffensive Failed, Costing 40,000 Lives.

According to Macgregor, 40,000 soldiers were killed in July 2023 alone, when Ukraine was at the height of its counteroffensive to “sweep the battlefield.” There are an equal number of amputees, for which Macgregor does not specify a time frame, but it is safe to conclude that it corresponds to the full duration of the war.

“We know the hospitals are full and that Ukrainian units at the Company and Platoon level (150 to 200 men) are in piecemeal fashion surrendering to the Russians,” he stated.

“Not because they don’t want to fight, but because they can’t.” Commanders declare, ‘If I can’t remove my wounded, I’ll surrender because the wounded will die.’ So they phone the Russians on the radio, speak in Russian, and say, ‘I have 50-60 wounded, and I’m surrendering because I don’t want them killed.'”

The Russians have treated surrendering and captured Ukrainian soldiers fairly from the start, and they know they will not be abused (and) will be exchanged for Russian detainees in the future, according to Macgregor.

Continue Reading

Finance

G7 Leaders Lend $50 Billion Russia’s Money to Ukraine

Published

on

G7 Leaders Lend $50 Billion Russia's Money to Ukraine
The G7 finance ministers: Reuters Image

At the behest of the United States, G7 leaders have agreed to offer at least $50 billion in loans to Ukraine, using interest from Russian sovereign assets. Russia’s assets in the G7 countries were frozen after the invasion of Ukraine more over two years ago.

In addition to Ukraine’s future, the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in the Gaza Strip was a prominent topic on the first day of their summit in Fasano, southern Italy, with the G7 members endorsing a US-proposed cease-fire agreement.

The G7 loan agreement was reached amid concerns about “Ukraine fatigue,” with questions remaining about how long the US and other like-minded countries can stay united in supplying Kyiv with weaponry and assisting it in rebuilding damaged infrastructure.

US President Joe Biden has described the Russian invasion, which began in February 2022, as “a test” for the globe, presenting the question of whether it can unify “for sovereignty, freedom, and against tyranny.”

“The United States, the G7, and countries around the world have constantly answered the question with ‘Yes, we will.’ We’ll say it again. “Yes, again and again, we will stand with Ukraine,” Biden said at a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was invited to the summit as a guest.

US perpetrated the loan

The US has committed to provide loans of up to $50 billion, according to a senior Biden administration official, adding that it will not be the only lender. “It will be a loan syndicate. We’re going to share the risk because we’re all committed to getting this done,” the official explained.

According to a Japanese official, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida informed his G7 counterparts that his country’s funds will not be utilized for military purposes due to its war-renouncing Constitution.

However, the official declined to provide information about the new lending scheme. He stated that the leaders “are planning to make some kind of announcement” regarding the plan in their communique, which is anticipated to be released Friday.

Since the invasion, the G7 has slapped a number of economic restrictions on Moscow, including asset freezes. The US official, who previewed the arrangement on the condition of anonymity, did not reveal which G7 members will participate in the new project.

A G7 source said Japan, the United Kingdom, and Canada are expected to join the US-led initiative, while France, Germany, and Italy are unlikely to participate for the time being because the European Union already has a comparable support plan.

Russia to bear the expense

According to the US source, Ukraine will not have to repay up to $50 billion in loans from the group of the world’s top industrialized democracies, which will begin this year. Russia will ultimately bear the expense.

According to the Japanese government, the G7, along with Australia, has frozen around $280 billion in Russian governmental assets, as well as approximately $58 billion in assets owned by individuals, companies, and organizations in the country.

Kishida’s government has concentrated on giving support for Ukraine’s rehabilitation in accordance with Japan’s Constitution, such as demining cooperation and nonlethal defense equipment.

During the summit’s opening session, Kishida emphasized the importance of maintaining a free and open international order based on the rule of law, as well as strengthening connections with developing and emerging countries in the “Global South,” according to Japan’s Foreign Ministry.

Both “have become increasingly important as we face new challenges, including Russia’s continued aggression against Ukraine and heightened tensions in the Middle East,” Kishida told the ministry.

Rebuilding Ukraine

Regarding Ukraine, Kishida stated that Japan is considering putting sanctions on foreign companies and groups for exporting supplies to Russia through third countries that could be diverted for military purpose, according to the ministry.

The action would be implemented with specific entities in China, India, Kazakhstan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Uzbekistan in mind, it stated.

The World Bank estimates that rebuilding Ukraine will cost $486 billion over the next decade, which Ukraine is expected to fund with loans, creating commercial opportunities for Japanese and international corporations.

In late May, Biden announced a three-stage cease-fire plan to end the conflict between Israel and Hamas, claiming it had been suggested by Israel and is customarily backed by the US.

The United Nations Security Council approved the plan earlier this month, but US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated on Wednesday that Hamas had made various adjustments, some of which were impossible.

International pressure has mounted on Israel to halt its military campaign in Gaza, which has displaced thousands of Palestinians and caused serious food, water, and energy shortages.

The G7 criticized Hamas’ “terrorist” strikes on October 7, which started Israel’s continuing offensive in the Gaza Strip, but avoided publicly denouncing Israel.

Source: BBC

Continue Reading

Ukraine War

Ukraine’s Zelensky Accuses China of Disrupting Peace Summit

Published

on

Ukraine's Zelensky Accuses China of Disrupting Peace Summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky: CNN Image

On Sunday, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky accused China of working hard to prevent countries from attending a peace talks, which Beijing has publicly criticized for not including Russia.

Zelensky made the statements during a security gathering in Singapore, where he hoped to raise support for the conference and advocate for additional military aid for Ukraine, which has been losing ground to Russian soldiers.

“China, unfortunately, is working hard today to prevent countries from coming to the peace summit,” Zelensky told reporters on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, which brings together defense experts from across the world.

Beijing believes the summit “should have the recognition of Russia and Ukraine, equal participation of all parties, and fair discussion of all peace plans,” foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said at a press conference. “Otherwise, it is difficult for the conference to play a substantive role in restoring peace,” she stated.

Biden and China’s Jinping absent

Zelensky also voiced dissatisfaction that “some world leaders” had not signed up for the meeting, with China indicating that Xi Jinping will not go and US President Joe Biden still to commit.

China stated that it would be “difficult” for it to attend if Russia did not participate, something Ukraine has denied.

Kyiv expects that the peace summit would provide wide international support for its vision of the parameters required to halt Russia’s war.

On Sunday, Zelensky announced that more than 100 countries and organizations had signed up for the meeting, and he invited Asia-Pacific states to join.

The peace meeting risks being overshadowed if prominent Ukraine supporter Biden, who is currently running for president against Donald Trump and has made no indication that he will attend, does not show up.

Zelensky described China as “a tool in Putin’s hands,” accusing Russia of utilizing Chinese influence and diplomats to derail the peace talks.

While China claims to be a neutral party in the Ukraine war, it has faced criticism for neglecting to denounce Moscow’s attack.

On Sunday, Zelensky met with US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on the sidelines of the Singapore Security Forum. Zelensky stated that they had a “very good” encounter.

Bilateral security agreement

In a post on X, Zelensky stated that the duo addressed “the defense needs of our country, bolstering Ukraine’s air defense system, the F-16 coalition, and the drafting of a bilateral security agreement.”

According to a summary of the meeting, Pentagon spokesman Major General Pat Ryder stated Austin underlined unwavering US support for Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression. He reaffirmed the US commitment to maintaining the strong support of a coalition of over fifty countries to help Ukraine defend its freedom,” Ryder stated.

The meeting occurred after Washington opted to partially ease limits on using US-supplied missiles to strike within Russia, which Zelensky hailed as a “step forward”.

Zelensky and Austin last met in December in Washington, where Zelensky made a last-ditch request for US funding before it ran out.

Following months of political bickering, the US Congress approved a $61 billion aid package for Ukraine in April, allowing the country’s outgunned military to receive desperately needed weapons.

Chinese Defense Spokesman Wu Qian told AFP that he was unaware of any plans for Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun to meet with Zelensky in Singapore. Ukraine is battling to contain a Russian ground incursion in the Kharkiv region, where Moscow just scored its largest territorial gains in 18 months.

Russia’s assets to bolster Ukraine War

Zelensky has been touring European countries in recent days, requesting more military supplies for Ukrainian troops and warning them of the dangers if they show any symptoms of exhaustion from the conflict.

“It is very important for Ukrainians that the world does not get tired… that the world understands that it cannot get tired of the war launched by the aggressor,” Zelensky told reporters on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s allies are grappling with how to extract funds from frozen Russian assets to bolster Kyiv’s war effort, a topic that is becoming more pressing as Russia gains territory on the battlefield and the outlook for Ukraine’s public finances worsens.

At the top of the agenda as financial officials from the Group of Seven affluent democracies meet in Stresa to discuss what to do with the frozen Russian central bank reserves in reaction to the invasion of Ukraine.

Ukraine and many of its supporters have asked for the seizure of US$260 billion in Russian assets frozen outside the country following the February 24, 2022 invasion.

However, European officials have refused, citing legal and financial stability concerns. The majority of the frozen assets are located in Europe.

Source: AFP

Continue Reading

Ukraine War

Ukraine is Losing Despite $330 Billion in Aid from the US and its NATO Allies

Published

on

Ukraine is Losing Despite $330 Billion
Ukraine soldiers carry the coffin of Col. Oleksandr Makhachek: Image AP

In recent days, Russian troops, backed by fighter jets, artillery, and deadly drones, have poured across Ukraine’s northeastern border and taken over at least nine villages and towns in the last three days. Each day, they’ve taken over more land than at almost any other time in the war, except for the beginning.

Ukrainian troops are pulling back in some places, and leaders are pointing the finger at each other for the losses. A lot of Ukrainian people are running away to Kharkiv, which is the closest big city.

Their advances are barely a few miles deep, but they have taken up approximately 100 kilometers (62 miles) of Ukrainian land. Russia took months to achieve the same result in Ukraine’s highly defended east.

Russia asserts that its forces have penetrated the border town of Vovchansk, which Ukraine disputes. The town has been heavily bombed in recent days, and thousands of civilians have been evacuated.

Denys Yaroslavskyi, the Commander of a Ukrainian Special Reconnaissance Unit, is outraged and wants to know what happened to Ukraine’s defenses. “There was no first line of defense.” We saw it. The Russians have just walked in. “They just walked in, with no mined fields,” he tells the BBC.

He claims officials claimed that defenses were being developed at great expense, but in his opinion, those defenses simply did not exist. “It was either a case of incompetence or corruption. It was not a failure. “It was betrayal.”

Everyone expected this incursion. Both Ukrainian and Western intelligence agencies were aware that Russia was assembling soldiers over the border, with estimates of up to 30,000 troops.

President Vladimir Putin had also openly expressed his intention to establish a buffer zone within the Kharkiv region to safeguard Russian territory from Ukrainian artillery strikes. However, despite government claims, Ukraine appears to have been unprepared.

Denys, who talked to the BBC from a park in Kharkiv, says he’ll be back on the front lines with his guys in an hour, near the town of Vovchansk, just 5 kilometers (3 miles) from the Russian border.

According to reports, Russian troops have already reached the town’s perimeter. Denys expresses concern that it may soon be back in Russian control.

We had previously visited the town, accompanying a local police officer, Oleksii, who was collecting up locals who wanted to evacuate to safety. He was driving quickly to evade the Russian drones hovering overhead and the continual bombardment of artillery.

Prior to the war, the town had a population of approximately 20,000. The majority had fled at the outset of the war, reducing the population to 3,000 – but hundreds more have left in recent days. According to Oleksii, “it’s easier to leave now, before they get killed or injured” .

Russia is advancing in Kharkiv by destroying Ukrainian villages and towns. Oleksii says that Russia has been shooting 50 to 60 shells into the town every hour.

Then there are glide bombs, which are launched from Russian jets tens of kilometers from the front lines, well beyond the range of Ukraine’s inadequate air defenses.

An explosion Friday after a Russian army tank fired on an apartment building in Mariupol, Ukraine

Russian army tank fired on an apartment building in Mariupol, Ukraine: Image AP

Russia Bombarding Ukraine

Russia has been shooting approximately 100 glide missiles every day across the 1,000 kilometer front. Over the course of an hour, we heard half a dozen jet-like screeches, followed by earth-shattering explosions.

Opening a new front in the north tests Ukraine’s limited resources. The US’s delay in approving additional military aid has depleted Ukrainian forces of ammunition.

Ukraine has been able to fire one artillery round per ten rounds fired by Russia. That is slowly being rectified, with US assistance now on the way.

However, the Kharkiv offensive highlighted issues that Ukraine has been too sluggish to address, such as mobilizing sufficient troops and constructing effective defense lines. Re-enforcements dispatched to Kharkiv have had to be taken from other sectors of the front, leaving insufficient reserves.

Ukrainian officials continue to stress that Kharkiv is not under fear of a ground invasion. However, the further the Russians push, the more probable it will be within range of Russian fire.

Denys believes Russian forces will try to focus on the east and take the entire Donbas. However, he claims Russia is also attempting to exploit Ukrainian weaknesses all along the 1,000-kilometer front. In Kharkiv, they found one.

President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky

President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky: Getty Images

Hundreds of Billion Spent

Since the beginning of the war, the United States Congress has passed five measures providing continued help to Ukraine, the latest recent in April 2024. The overall budget authority under these bills, known as the “headline” figure, is $175 billion.

Dozens of other countries, including most NATO and EU members, are also contributing significant aid to Ukraine.

Furthermore, on February 1, 2024, European leaders decided to spend up to $54 billion for a new Ukraine Facility to support Ukraine’s recovery, reconstruction, and modernization, as well as its reform initiatives as part of the EU membership process, until 2027.

This takes their total commitment to date to more than $155 billion. Since Russia’s invasion in February 2022, the United States and its NATO partners have allocated $330 billion to Ukraine.

Russia’s military and war-related spending is expected to increase 29% year on year to 12.8 trillion rubles, or nearly $140 billion.

Meanwhile, Ukraine faces an existential threat equal only to the moment immediately before Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. However, unlike in the past, improvements are unlikely to occur very soon.

Ukraine may lose the war

Not only have conditions along the frontline deteriorated significantly, according to Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky, but the possibility of a Ukrainian defeat is now being discussed in public by people such as General Sir Richard Barrons, former commander of the UK’s Joint Forces Command.

On April 13th, Barrons stated to the BBC that Ukraine may lose the war by 2024 due to a sense of inability to win. And when it reaches that point, why would anyone want to fight and die to protect the indefensible?

This could be his strategy of pressuring the West to offer greater military supplies to Ukraine more rapidly.

However, the fact that the secretary general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Jens Stoltenberg, publicly accepts that in order to end the war, Ukraine will have to negotiate with Russia and decide ‘what kind of compromises they’re willing to do’ is a clear indication that things are not going well for Ukraine.

By Geoff Thomas

Continue Reading

Trending