Connect with us

World News

New Book Suggests Hillary Clinton Blamed Everyone but Herself for Humiliating Election Defeat

Published

on

Hillary Clinton onstage at the Women in the World Summit in New York City on April 6. – Reuters

NEW YORK – A new book on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for president details how the candidate seemed to blame everyone but herself for her stunning loss to President Donald Trump.

Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes wrote in “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign” that Clinton’s campaign lacked vision and was filled with infighting staffers who were more concerned about their own careers than they were about helping the candidate win.

The Democratic presidential nominee reportedly laid blame on several external factors — incompetent campaign staff, Russian interference in the election, the news media, and FBI Director Jim Comey — rather than consider that she was a flawed candidate. Her campaign has publicly blamed Comey for the loss.

It all started with the scandal surrounding her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.

During the first months of the scandal, Clinton reportedly thought she did nothing wrong and was angry that she was being treated “like a common criminal.” She blamed Republicans in Congress, conservative donors, and the media for all the negative coverage of the email story.

Allen and Parnes wrote that while Clinton “should have been angry with herself” for her decision to use a private server while working for the government, she instead “turned her fury on her consultants and campaign aides, blaming them for a failure to focus the media on her platform.”

Neither Hillary nor her husband, former President Bill Clinton, the book said, “could accept the simple fact that Hillary had hamstrung her own campaign and dealt the most serious blow to her own presidential aspirations.”

That became apparent during a mid-August 2015 conference call, in which the Clintons accosted high-level campaign staffers for failing to get the media to focus on Clinton’s message rather than on the email scandal. One of the participants on the call reportedly called it an “ass-chewing.”

It took months for those close to Clinton to persuade her to apologize for using a private server in September. The media firestorm calmed a bit once she did, and she got a boost when Vice President Joe Biden declined to challenge her in the primaries. But she faced more defining setbacks in the primary process.

Clinton and Sanders

Clinton with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Brian Snyder/Reuters

– 

‘We haven’t made our case’

A turning point came in March, when Clinton lost the Michigan primary to Sen. Bernie Sanders, her chief rival for the Democratic presidential nomination. The result stunned observers and defied polling leading up to the day of the vote.

Clinton again blamed her campaign team for “failing to hone her message, energize important constituencies, and take care of business in getting voters to the polls,” Allen and Parnes wrote.

During a debate-prep session, Clinton reportedly snapped at senior policy adviser Jake Sullivan, who was criticizing her performance.

“It wasn’t just Sullivan in her crosshairs,” Allen and Parnes wrote. “She let everyone on her team have it that day. ‘We haven’t made our case,’ she fumed. ‘We haven’t framed the choice. We haven’t done the politics.'”

One aide who was in the room for the debate prep said Clinton was “visibly, unflinchingly pissed off at us as a group” and she “let us know she felt that way.”

Clinton’s team had reportedly warned her about some of her weak spots, but she reportedly “hadn’t corrected for these problems.” And aides seemed afraid to speak out for fear of seeming disloyal.

“The one person with whom she didn’t seem particularly upset: herself,” Allen and Parnes wrote. “No one who drew a salary from the campaign would tell her that. It was a self-signed death warrant to raise a question about Hillary’s competence — to her or anyone else — in loyalty-obsessed Clintonworld.”

A top campaign lieutenant described Clinton’s loss in the Michigan primary as the “tipping point” for the campaign.

Things got worse from there. The summer and early fall were dominated by the leaking of emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. Later in, FBI Director Jim Comey announced a renewed look into whether Clinton discussed classified information over her private email server.

After she lost the election to Trump, Clinton “kept circling back to two factors: James Comey and Russia,” according to the book. The email leaks have been blamed on Russia, and during the final days before the election, Comey notified Congress that the bureau was renewing its investigation into Clinton’s private email server. The bureau had found emails it thought might be related to the investigation after it seized devices belonging to Clinton aide Huma Abedin and her husband, former congressman Anthony Weiner.

On election night in her hotel suite, Clinton “lashed out,” Allen and Parnes wrote. “Her voice rose. Her eyes grew wider. Her hands began moving again. ‘These guys came in,’ she huffed. ‘We were doing better until this happened.'”

FBI Director James Comey waits before testifying at a House Intelligence Committee hearing into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 20, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

FBI Director James Comey at a House Intelligence Committee hearing in Washington. Thomson Reuters

‘A perfect storm’

The blame game continued in the days after the election. In one phone call with a friend a couple of days after the election, Clinton “put a fine point on the factors she believed cost her the presidency: the FBI (Comey), the KGB (the old name for Russia’s intelligence service), and the KKK (the support Trump got from white nationalists),” Allen and Parnes wrote.

In other phone calls, Clinton reportedly “declined to take responsibility for her own loss.”

“From Hillary’s perspective, external forces created a perfect storm that wiped her out,” Allen and Parnes wrote. “In this telling, laid out in scores of interviews with Clinton campaign aides and advisers … the media bought into an absurd and partisan Republican-led investigation into her email server that combined with Bernie Sanders’ attack on her character and a conservative assault on the Clinton Foundation’s practices to sow a public perception that she was fundamentally dishonest.”

Some of her staunchest defenders “maintain that she nailed every major moment of the campaign,” Allen and Parnes wrote. They added, however, that another view, “articulated by a much smaller number of her close friends and high-level advisers, holds that Hillary bears the blame for her defeat” because of her own actions and her inability to “prove to many voters that she was running for the presidency because she had a vision for the country rather than visions of power.”

In their eyes, the book said, Clinton also failed to connect with the voters who were inspired by Sanders and Trump. And some on her campaign thought she lacked the vision of other politicians like President Barack Obama.

This was on display during her speech at the Democratic National Convention.

“One of the clearest lines of distinction between a great political speech and a pedestrian one is the ability of the speaker to turn the peroration — the final run — into a big call for action,” Allen and Parnes wrote. “Hillary’s fell flat. Her pro speechwriters knew it would. They tried to save her from being hokey and timid. But she’d ignored them.”

Clinton ended her speech that night by saying “America’s destiny is ours to choose” and repeating her “Stronger Together” campaign slogan.

Clinton did, however, offer contrition to at least one person on election night — Obama.

After she conceded the election to Trump, Obama place a consolation call to Clinton. In this moment, “the reality and dimensions of her defeat hit her all at once,” according to the book.

“Reluctantly, she rose from her seat and took the phone,” Allen and Parnes wrote.

“‘Mr. President,’ she said softly, ‘I’m sorry.'”

By Pamela Engel – Business Insider

Continue Reading

World News

Marine Le Pen’s National Rally Wins the First Round in France 2024 Election

Published

on

Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally (RN) party scored historic gains in France

Exit polls in France showed that Marine Le Pen’s right-wing National Rally (RN) party made huge gains to win the first round of election on Sunday. However, the final outcome will depend on how people trade votes in the days before next week’s run-off.

Exit polls from Ipsos, Ifop, OpinionWay, and Elabe showed that the RN got about 34% of the vote. This was a big loss for President Emmanuel Macron, who called the early election after his party lost badly in the European Parliament elections earlier this month.

The National Rally (RN) easily won more votes than its opponents on the left and center, including Macron’s Together group, whose bloc was predicted to get 20.5% to 23% of the vote. Exit polls showed that the New Popular Front (NFP), a hastily put together left-wing alliance, would get about 29% of the vote.

The results of the exit polls matched what people said in polls before the election, which made Le Pen’s fans very happy. But they didn’t say for sure if the anti-immigrant, anti-EU National Rally (RN) will be able to “cohabit” with the pro-EU Macron in a government after the runoff election next Sunday.

Voters in France Angry at Macron

Many French people have looked down on the National Rally (RN) for a long time, but now it is closer to power than it has ever been. A party known for racism and antisemitism has tried to clean up its image, and it has worked. Voters are angry at Macron, the high cost of living, and rising concerns about immigration.

Fans of Marine Le Pen waved French flags and sang the Marseillaise in the northern French district of Henin-Beaumont. The crowd cheered as Le Pen said, “The French have shown they are ready to turn the page on a power that is disrespectful and destructive.”

The National Rally’s chances of taking power next week will rest on what political deals its opponents make in the next few days. Right-wing and left-wing parties used to work together to keep the National Rally (RN) out of power, but the “republican front,” which refers to this group, is less stable than ever.

If no candidate gets 50% of the vote in the first round, the top two candidates and anyone else with 12.5% of the registered voters immediately move on to the second round. The district goes to the person who gets the most votes in the runoff.

France is likely to have a record number of three-way runoffs because so many people voted on Sunday. Experts say that these are much better for the National Rally (RN) than two-way games. Almost right away on Sunday night, the horse trade began.

Macron asked people to support candidates who are “clearly republican and democratic.” Based on what he has said recently, this would rule out candidates from the National Rally (RN) and the hard-left France Unbowed (LFI) party. Leaders on the far left and the center left both asked their third-placed candidates to drop out.

Minority government

Jean-Luc Melenchon, leader of France Unbowed, said, “Our rule is simple and clear: not a single more vote for the National Rally.” But the center-right Republicans party, which split before the vote when some of its members joined the RN, didn’t say anything.

The president of the RN party, Jordan Bardella, who is 28 years old, said he was ready to be prime minister if his party gets a majority of seats. He has said he won’t try to make a minority government, and neither Macron nor the communist NFP will work with him.

“I will be a “cohabitation” Prime Minister, respectful of the constitution and of the office of President of the Republic, but uncompromising about the policies we will implement,” he said.

A few thousand anti-RN protesters met in Paris’s Republique square on Sunday night for a rally of the leftist alliance. The mood was gloomy.

Niya Khaldi, a 33-year-old teacher, said that the RN’s good results made her feel “disgust, sadness, and fear.”

“This is not how I normally act,” she said. “I think I came to reassure myself, to not feel alone.”

Election Runoff

The result on Sunday didn’t have much of an effect on the market. In early Asia-Pacific trade, the euro gained about 0.23%. Fiona Cincotta, a senior markets expert at City Index in London, said she was glad the outcome “didn’t come as a surprise.”

“Le Pen had a slightly smaller margin than some of the polls had pointed to, which may have helped the euro a little bit higher on the open,” she noted. “Now everyone is waiting for July 7 to see if the second round supports a clear majority or not. So it does feel like we’re on the edge of something.”

Some pollsters thought the RN would win the most seats in the National Assembly, but Elabe was the only one who thought the party would win all 289 seats in the run-off. Seat projections made after the first round of voting are often very wrong, and this race is no exception.

On Sunday night, Reuters reported there were no final results for the whole country yet, but they were due in the next few hours. In France, exit polls have usually been very accurate.

Voter turnout was high compared to previous parliamentary elections. This shows how passionate people are about politics after Macron made the shocking and politically risky decision to call a vote in parliament.

Mathieu Gallard, research head at Ipsos France, said that at 1500 GMT, nearly 60% of voters had turned out, up from 39.42% two years earlier. This was the highest comparable turnout since the 1986 legislative vote. It wasn’t clear when the official number of people who voted would be changed.

 

Continue Reading

World News

Pakistan Seeks US Support for Counter-Terrorism Operation Azm-e-Istehkam

Published

on

Pakistan

(CTN News) – Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, Masood Khan, has urged Washington to provide Pakistan with sophisticated small arms and communication equipment to ensure the success of Operation Azm-e-Istehkam, a newly approved counter-terrorism initiative in the country.

The federal government recently approved the reinvigorated national counter-terrorism drive, which comprises three components: doctrinal, societal, and operational.

Ambassador Khan noted that work on the first two phases has already begun, with the third phase set to be implemented soon.

Addressing US policymakers, scholars, and corporate leaders at the Wilson Center in Washington, Khan emphasized the importance of strong security links, enhanced intelligence cooperation, and the resumption of sales of advanced military platforms between Pakistan and the US.

He argued that this is crucial for regional security and countering the rising tide of terrorism, which also threatens the interests of the US and its allies.

“Pakistan has launched Azm-i-Istehkam […] to oppose and dismantle terrorist networks. For that, we need sophisticated small arms and communication equipment,” said Ambassador Khan.

Pakistan–United States relations

The ambassador observed that the prospects of Pakistan-United States relations were bright, stating that the two countries “share values, our security and economic interests are interwoven, and it is the aspiration of our two peoples that strengthens our ties.”

He invited US investors and businesses to explore Pakistan’s potential in terms of demographic dividend, technological advancements, and market opportunities.

Khan also suggested that the US should consider Pakistan as a partner in its diplomatic efforts in Kabul and collaborate on counterterrorism and the rights of women and girls in Afghanistan.

He stressed that the bilateral relationship should be based on ground realities and not be hindered by a few issues.

“We should not base our engagement on the incongruity of expectations.

Our ties should be anchored in ground realities, even as we aim for stronger security and economic partnerships. Secondly, one or two issues should not hold the entire relationship hostage,” said the ambassador.

Continue Reading

World News

China Urges Taiwanese to Visit Mainland ‘Without Worry’ Despite Execution Threat

Published

on

China Urges Taiwanese to Visit Mainland Without Worry Despite Threats

China has reassured Taiwanese citizens that they can visit the mainland “without the slightest worry”, despite Taiwan raising its travel alert to the second-highest level in response to Beijing’s new judicial guidelines targeting supporters of Taiwanese independence.

Last week, China published guidelines that could impose the death penalty for “particularly serious” cases involving “diehard” advocates of Taiwanese independence.

In response, Taiwan’s government urged the public to avoid “unnecessary travel” to mainland China and Hong Kong, and raised its travel warning to the “orange” level.

However, Zhu Fenglian, a spokeswoman for a Chinese body overseeing Taiwan affairs, stated that the new directives are “aimed solely at the very small number of supporters of ‘Taiwan independence’, who are engaged in malicious acts and utterances”.

She emphasized that “the vast majority of Taiwan compatriots involved in cross-strait exchanges and cooperation do not need to have the slightest worry when they come to or leave mainland China”.

“They can arrive in high spirits and leave fully satisfied with their stay,” Zhu added.

What’s Behind The China-Taiwan Tensions?

The tensions stem from the longstanding dispute over Taiwan’s status. Mainland China claims Taiwan as part of its territory and has refused to rule out using force to bring the democratic island under its control, while Taiwan sees itself as a sovereign state.

Beijing has not conducted top-level communications with Taipei since 2016, when the Democratic Progressive Party’s Tsai Ing-wen became Taiwan’s leader. China has since branded her successor, President Lai Ching-te, a “dangerous separatist”.

“The DPP authorities have fabricated excuses to deceive the people on the island and incite confrontation and opposition,” Zhu said in her statement.
Despite the political tensions, many Taiwanese continue to travel to mainland China for work, study, or business.

Continue Reading

Trending