Thailand Politics
Thai Government Proposes New Bill to Ban Street Begging and Regulate Busking
BANGKOK – Speaking after a cabinet meeting yesterday, government spokesman Yongyuth Mayalarp said the cabinet has approved a new bill to ban street begging and regulate busking activities, proposed by the Social Development and Human Security Ministry.
The changes would replace the Begging Control Act, which only imposes curbs on begging, and which has been in force since 1941.
The move is aimed at ending the practice of people begging on the streets and will encourage those found begging to find careers, the spokesman said.
He did not say what would happen to those who are physically incapacitated, too told to work or how the bill might aide in police corruption.
Under the bill, all street beggars would be banned and those who beg for money in public places would be taken for occupational training programs to start a career if they are Thais and deported if they are migrants.
Buskers would be required to seek approval from local authorities first. Those who perform without permission would be penalized.
The ministry is to work on a clear definition of begging before forwarding the bill to the National Legislative Assembly for consideration.
Handing over money to child beggars is not an act of kindness, says the Mirror Foundation
Meanwhile according to Witanapat Rutanavaleepong, head of the Stop Child Begging Project by the Mirror Foundation, kidnappers are looking for children and are hiding out in white vans with no registration plates.
When they see their victim, they will hop out of the van, snatch the child and flee the scene. That unfortunate child will then have his arms and legs cut off and be forced to beg on the street. You must have seen some of them — they are people’s stolen children!
Witanapat Rutanavaleepong, head of the Stop Child Begging Project by the Mirror Foundation, although it is good to warn children about kidnappers, such a distorted and exaggerated story can confuse them. The story also distorts the public’s view on the issues surrounding child beggars.
“In my experience working here at the Mirror Foundation, there has been no case of kidnapping in vans. It is nothing but a myth,” Witanapat said.
The amputation part of the story is even more ridiculous as it is a process that requires complicated medical procedures and skills. Witanapat explained that having spoken to many doctors, it is almost certain that cutting off a child’s arms and legs would mean a high risk of them bleeding to death.
“And that just wouldn’t make sense,” explains Witanapat. “If the kidnapper’s purpose was to use the children as a tool to earn money, why would they risk killing them? Some stories even claim that children have their internal organs taken out to be sold and then left to die. This also has no truth in it, because organ transplants are not that simple.”
So, despite the issue of child begging often assumed to be related to cases of missing or kidnapped children, thanks to the aforementioned widely circulated urban myth, they are, in fact, usually two very different matters.
“Most of the children begging on the street today are victims of human trafficking, either bought or lured into the industry from rural Cambodia and Myanmar,” Witanapat said. “The situation has worsened over the years and we can see many child beggars in major cities throughout the country.”
Begging does not have to be as straightforward as a child sitting on the road,
rattling a tin — child begging comes in many shapes and forms. For example, children in student uniforms carrying donation boxes are sometimes Cambodian children trafficked into Thailand to work as beggars and are not actual students.
Through the Stop Child Begging Project, the Mirror Foundation is urging people to cease giving money in order to put a stop to this hideous industry, as the more money the children make, the more children that are inevitably brought into the circle.
“Child beggars are not taught necessary skills — they don’t go to school, they don’t get to mingle with people and they have no job skills. They are raised to believe that they can make money by just sitting there. When they grow up, they either end up in the sex industry or work as the observers, making sure the next generation of child beggars is doing their work. By helping them, you are actually depriving them of a better future.”
Telling that to a society that believes in giving, however, can be quite tricky. The issue poses a moral dilemma for many. Is it a sin to ignore a child in need, or is it more sinful to support child begging? There is no easy answer. Yaowapa*, who works in the Asok area, said she gives money to child beggars regularly because she feels sorry for them.
“How can I not give them money? I know those poor children will be beaten up if they don’t meet their target,” she said. “I know it’s an industry, but still, the burden is on the children. It’s not like anyone else is helping them — policemen walk by and don’t even pay attention. I care more about helping the child in front of me,” she reasoned.
She might have a point — are the police really doing enough to put an end to child begging? Every day on the skywalk that bridges Siam and Chidlom BTS stations, children can be seen begging. Some have been working there for several months. The skywalk, dotted with child and adult beggars, is ironically right in front of the Royal Thai Police Headquarters.
“It cannot be generalised that the police do not want to help — some do and some don’t. We have worked with some very helpful policemen who assisted us in following the children to their homes and arrested the adults who controlled the children. There were also some who dismissed the problem and said there was no point tackling the child beggars, as most of them would just come back or go beg elsewhere,” said Witanapat.
Despite the increased awareness about the ugly truth about child begging, the industry is undoubtedly thriving, with child beggars in busy areas such as Asok, Siam and Silom reportedly making up to 3,000 baht a day. Many poor parents in Cambodia are allegedly willing to sell their children to work in Bangkok for just a few thousand baht in the hope that they may live a better life.
“The money does not go to these children — it is used to buy more children. If you think you are making merit by helping that child in front of you, just think how many more children will be sitting on the street begging later. Once the child is in the begging industry, there is no way out,” he warned.
Witanapat tells Life that, although there are some missing/kidnapped children who do end up as beggars, the numbers and frequency of such incidences are nothing like it seems in the well-known urban myth.
“The danger of telling your children the van story is that they might not realise that most kidnappers don’t come over and snatch them away. In most cases, the children voluntarily walk away with them because the kidnappers know how to convince them. It is better to teach your children not to trust strangers than to scare them with such a far-fetched story,” Witanapat said. He also added that most kidnapped children are not made to beg, but more likely to be sexually assaulted.
Another popular myth is that you have to wait 24 hours to report a missing person. If your child is missing, you can report it to the police right away. In the Foundation’s experience, 70% of missing children are found.
Social media plays an important role in tracking down missing children, as many of them are found when the news is shared on Facebook. There are some who post pictures of missing children, however, even after they have been found, to spur the number of likes on their page.
“Before you share the picture of a missing child, it is advised to do some background checks to see whether the child is still missing,” said Witanapat. “Sometimes, we see pictures of children who have been found and contact the page, but they refuse to take the pictures down because they grab a lot of attention and generate likes, which is great commercial tools for their page.”
* Name has been changed.
What to do when you see a child beggar
The Mirror Foundation suggests you think about the following before you put money in the tin:
Be sceptical before giving money. It does not make sense for a child wearing a student uniform to be begging for donations in the middle of a school day.
If the uniform does not have the child’s name and school logo, it is possible that the child is not a real student.
Talk to the child. If the child does not speak Thai, it is possible he/she is a victim of human trafficking.
If you notice something strange, such as the child appearing with different adults, or the same adult coming with different children, alert the police or contact The Mirror Foundation.
Children selling flowers at night is another form of child begging. Be cautious of them, too. Supporting them might perpetuate the problem.
If you feel that you really must help the child, give them food or clothes instead of money.

Thailand Politics
Thai Prime Minister’s Popularity Declines as Move Forward Party dominates

(CTN News) – Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin continues to make local and international visits to try to solve problems and promote Thailand, but he has failed to impress most voters, according to a Nida poll. The poll also revealed the declining popularity of Pheu Thai Party leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra and the rise of the Move Forward Party.
According to a poll released on Sunday, only 12.85% of people supported the prime minister, down from 17.75% in the previous survey. The daughter of convicted former Prime Minister Thaksin, currently on parole, saw her popularity drop from 6% to 4.85%.
The National Institute of Development Administration conducts a quarterly survey of the public’s preferred political leaders. The last survey was released at the end of March.
According to the survey, supporters of the prime minister described Mr Srettha as a resolute decision-maker determined to address their problems. Ms Paetongtarn was complimented for her vision, leadership, knowledge, and grasp of the country’s difficulties.
This weekend, the prime minister will be in the northeast region listening to citizens’ concerns. The journey occurred only a few days after he had visited northern provinces earlier in the week.
Despite criticism, he has reduced his abroad trips, citing the need to showcase Thailand to investors and traders.
Pita Limjaroenrat, the chief advisor of the Move Forward Party, remained the top candidate for prime minister with 45.50% of the vote, up slightly from 42.75% in the previous quarter’s poll.
Pirapan Salirathavibhaga was the huge winner. The leader of the United Thai National Party saw his popularity nearly quadruple from 3.55% to 6.85%.
The sampled voters stated they appreciated Mr Pita’s political beliefs and thought he had broad knowledge. They praised Mr Pirapan’s credibility, claiming he was clean and honest.
Two other probable prime minister candidates were Khunying Sudarat Keyuraphan of the Thai Sang Thai Party and Anutin Chanvirakul, leader of Bhumjaithai. However, they were less popular than others.
About 20% of voters still did not believe any candidate was qualified to lead the country, which is the same percentage as in the last survey.
Move Forward Party was the most popular party with 49.20%, up slightly from three months ago, while Pheu Thai fell around five percentage points to 16.85% from 22.10%.
The poll, issued on Sunday, surveyed 2,000 ineligible voters between June 14 and June 18.
More in: Move Forward Party
Thailand Politics
Move Forward Party MP Jirat Thongsuwan Appeals Suspended Jail Sentence for Defamation

(CTN News) – Jirat Thongsuwan, a Move Forward Party MP, says he would appeal his one-year suspended jail sentence for defaming a former senior defense ministry official concerning the state’s procurement of bogus bomb detectors.
The Criminal Court also fined Mr Jirat 100,000 baht for falsely accusing ACM Tharet Punsri, a former Air Force chief-of-staff who later became the ministry’s deputy permanent secretary, of being the chairman and shareholder of a company that supplied the military with the infamous GT200 bomb detectors.
The Chachoengsao MP claimed a July 20, 2022, no-confidence vote against cabinet ministers in Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha’s government. ACM Tharet was not a cabinet member.
Jirat Thongsuwan also identified ACM Tharet as a key figure in the 2006 coup headed by then-army chief Gen Sonthi Boonyaratkalin, which overthrew Thaksin Shinawatra.
ACM Tharet told the court that Jirat Thongsuwan’s charges were false and harmed his reputation. He denied involvement with the bomb detection company and said he was not the company’s senior chairman or shareholder.
In addition to the suspended jail term and fine, the court ordered Jirat Thongsuwan to pay $ 500,000 baht in damages to ACM Tharet and publish an apology in three newspapers for five days.
Jirat Thongsuwan later announced on his X account that he had challenged the verdict with the hashtag “An injustice is infuriating”.
The MP has also been accused of dodging required military conscription. He admitted to the accusation on May 8.
A British business promoted the GT200 as a “remote substance detector” and sold it in several countries. Between 2004 and 2009, fourteen Thai government organizations, most of which were military, were projected to spend 1.4 billion baht on the units.
Concerns about the GT200 and related gadgets arose after the National Science and Technology Development Agency discovered they lacked electronic components.
The devices were later revealed to be “divining rods”.
Thailand Politics
Thaksin Shinawatra Files 100 Million Baht Defamation Lawsuit Against Warong Dechgitvigrom

(CTN News) – Thaksin Shinawatra, the former prime minister, has launched a defamation action against Warong Dechgitvigrom, the head of the Thai Pakdee Party, accusing him of paying a bribe to be released on bail in a lese majeste case.
Thaksin’s attorney, Winyat Chartmontree, filed a lawsuit against Warong, seeking 100 million baht in damages.
Warong, a long-time Thaksin Shinawatra critic, gave a public statement and posted on social media, saying that 2 billion baht was paid to judicial officials in exchange for release on bail in the lese majeste case.
Thaksin Shinawatra Granted Release on 500,000 Baht Bond
Thaksin was granted release on a 500,000 baht bond last week and told not to leave the country without court authorization after pleading innocent to charges of defaming King Rama IX in a 2015 interview with South Korean media.
Winyat stated that, while Warong did not identify Thaksin Shinawatra by name in his speech or post, he did include a hashtag with Thaksin’s name as well as the date Thaksin must appear in court, allowing readers to connect Thaksin to the allegations.
Winyat further stated that he was investigating the fact that Warong mentioned the specific aircraft and automobiles utilized by Thaksin Shinawatra to violate the Personal Data Protection Act.
“I have requested Mr Warong to provide proof as to where he received the data. “If it turns out that it came from state officials, there will be legal consequences,” he warned.
The Criminal Court has scheduled the case’s preliminary hearing for September 30.
-
News3 years ago
Let’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health4 years ago
How Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech2 years ago
Top Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles3 years ago
Aries Soulmate Signs
-
Movies2 years ago
What Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Health3 years ago
Can I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Learning3 years ago
Virtual Numbers: What Are They For?