Tech
How To Hire A Freelance Software Developer In Singapore
Hiring a freelance software developer in Singapore
Whether you are a startup looking for a simple, affordable freelance software developer for your business, or an established business looking to take your next digital steps, finding a software developer can be a daunting task.
After a quick Google search you will probably see that you could browse for hours on end looking at all the profiles that pop up.
Selecting the right freelancer for your project is important, else you could end up wasting your time and money.
Entrepreneurs are increasingly using freelancers to do one task instead of using a full-time employee.
Freelancers offer the advantages of being cheaper, with less time, paperwork, and know-how needed.
Freelancers are individuals who work remotely for companies, some are located in Singapore while others are located in other countries like the United States or India.
Freelancers can work either full-time or part-time, depending on their preference, and can have one employer or many at the same time.
With the rise of freelancing in Singapore, hiring has become a breeze.
Freelancers can do simple jobs like writing and data entry, or more specialised jobs like web design.
The ability to hire someone remotely eliminates the problem faced by many companies – especially if they are in an area where there are few experts in the skills they need.
How to find a freelance software developer in Singapore
You will have two options when looking for freelancers. The first is to find them using a marketplace website like Fiverr, Upwork, or Arc.
These websites allow freelancers to create profiles, showcase their skills, experience and portfolios, as well as receive reviews from past clients.
The second is to work with a freelancer directly. They will have their own website, where they showcase their skills and portfolio.
Hiring a freelance software developer through a marketplace
There are many benefits of hiring freelancers, but there are still many questions that come up about sourcing the right candidates.
Online marketplaces usually benefit the buyer. The reason for this is that the marketplace company is willing to protect its reputation by offering as much support to the buyer as possible.
So it might sound like a perfect option, but there is a side effect caused by that. Sellers are often left overworked and unpaid.
For example, a seller might spend a week working on a project, and a difficult client could be unhappy about something and contact the marketplaces customer support team.
After a bit of complaining and mentioning how much they dislike the platform, in fear of a customer going around leaving bad reviews about the company, they will side with the customer and offer them a refund.
This leaves the freelancer out of time and money. Now not all marketplaces do this but it is more common than you would like.
Just a quick Google search for “don’t use fiverr” or “don’t use upwork” and you will see a bunch of horror stories.
The side effect of this is that the best software developers might stay away from these platforms and take the time to build up their client base without being dependent on a middle man.
That way they could deal with the customer directly and not have their income dependent on a large for profit company.
Another good thing turned bad is that marketplaces are cheap. Marketplaces let software developers from all countries create a profile and offer their services.
This is great for hiring because now instead of having access to the few software developers located near your home or office, you have access to any software developer on the planet.
So maybe you live in an area where the standard is low to medium compared to the global standard, marketplaces give you access to the full spectrum of freelancers.
Having access to all freelancers might sound great superficially, but there is a lot more to it.
The cost of living in Croatia is a lot lower than Singapore, so someone working in Singapore needs to earn a lot more to pay the bills.
This creates a situation where freelancers based in cheaper countries can charge a lot less than those based in first world countries.
This makes it impossible for freelance software developers in Singapore to compete. So that drives the best and most talented developers far away from these platforms.
You can definitely find some good developers there, but if you put yourself in their shoes, would you work for half your worth if you had other opportunities? Most certainly not, so maybe hiring a freelance developer directly is the better bet.
Hiring a freelance software developer directly
To escape the tight competition and low earning of marketplaces the most skilled software developers work with clients directly.
They will set up their own website where they will list all the apps they have built and also tell you a bit about themselves and how they work.
The two ways you can find them is by searching Google for “freelance software developer in Singapore” or doing a similar search on LinkedIn, where they will include the word “freelance” in their title.
These freelancers typically deliver higher quality work than those on marketplaces, but you also lose the customer support and payment protection.
Why you shouldn’t hire a freelance software developer
We have received far too many emails from people who have worked with a freelancer and now have semi functional software that they cannot launch, plus they are out a huge chunk of money.
So now they need to reach out to a software development company in Singapore to see if there is a way to save their project.
The main reason people hire freelancers instead of companies to develop their custom software is cost.
Freelancers typically charge less because they work alone and don’t need to pay employees and cover other expenses.
They are still not by any means cheap, and the cost might be less than a large company, but compared to a smaller team, there is only a slight price difference.
However, that slight difference is probably the best investment you will ever make.
Working with a professional team means that quality of service is ensured. Freelancers are known for not being consistent, where companies have a team of trained professionals who have launched many projects.
Having a sound process is essential to developing first-class custom software platforms!
This ensures that the software is well designed, soundly engineered and built to scale with your business.
It also ensures that timeframes are met and costs are minimised. This way you pay once and your platform just works.
No need to go running around trying to patch things up after the freelancer couldn’t complete some features.
Communication is also a big issue when working with freelance software developers. It’s not good to stereotype, but us developers are known to not be the most social.
Freelancers just want to code and don’t want to deal with clients and that makes it difficult to fully understand their clients needs and that leads to all sorts of issues where the final product just isn’t what you thought of during the initial discussion.
At our team we believe in constant communication, feedback and iteration, and that’s why our clients are always fully satisfied with the final products we deliver.
Now let’s imagine the best case scenario, where the freelancer develops the first version of your custom software and it works well so you launch.
The launch is a success and users love using your new interesting platform, but now there are some small bugs, which is natural as it scales and also you want to add some more features.
But after reaching out to the freelancer you find out that they are busy with another project or just not available right now.
That puts you in a stressful situation. Freelancers don’t have a team so they only work on one project at a time.
Because of that the chances of you getting something done when needed are low. When you work with a team, they are always available for you.
Once we finish the project we will continue to work with you as long as needed so we can squash any bad bugs and build features as you grow your company into a huge success.
There is no need to work with a freelance developer in Singapore, since some of the best software developers in the world are located here.
So if you want to have a successful project developed, be sure to look for a company to partner up with.
Related CTN News:
WorkinTool PDF Converter Ultimate Review
How We Can View Instagram Stories Anonymously?
Why Should Your Org Plan For Deepfake Fraud Before It Happens
(VOR News) – The ruling is that Google, the greatest technology firm in the world, is required to make its Android smartphone operating system available to merchants that supply applications that are in direct rivalry with Google’s. This decision was reached by a judge in the United States of America.
The Android Play store, which is owned and operated by Google, was found to be an example of an illegal monopoly arrangement by a jury in the state of California on Monday. The finding was reached by a jury. Monday is the day that this decision was come to.
An earlier federal judge ruled Google’s search engine illegal.
This finding, which came after that decision, has forced the company to suffer yet another setback. As a result of the corporation having already encountered its initial obstacle, this decision has been established. This particular decision was made by the judge during the month of August, when the month was in progress.
In light of the fact that the decision was made, what exactly does it mean that the choice was accepted?
In accordance with the verdict, Google is obligated to make it possible for users to download Android app stores that are offered by third-party competitors. For a period of three years, the corporation is prohibited from imposing restrictions on the usage of payment mechanisms that are integrated into the application.
In addition, it is important to keep in mind that Google does not possess the right to impose restrictions on the utilization of ways to make payments online.
Additionally, the verdict makes it unlawful for Google to give money to manufacturers of smartphones in order to preinstall its app store. Smartphone manufacturers are prohibited from doing so.
Furthermore, it prevents Google from the possibility of sharing the revenue that is generated by the Play store with other companies that are in the industry of delivering mobile applications.
In addition to this, the court has mandated the establishment of a technical committee that will be made up of three different people chosen at random.
The committee will be responsible for monitoring the implementation of the reforms and finding solutions to any disagreements that may occur as a consequence of the implementation of the reforms while they are being implemented. This task will fall under the committee’s purview so that it may fulfill its duties.
However, certain components were allowed to be put into action until July 1st, despite the fact that the judge’s statement suggested that the ruling would take effect on November 1st. The statement was the basis for the ruling, which ultimately became effective.
Particularly, I wanted to know what Google’s reaction would be.
There is a fact that Google does not adhere to this directive, which has been brought to their attention. This document argued that the alterations that the judge had ordered to be made would “cause a range of unintended consequences that will harm American consumers, developers, and device makers.”
The judge had ordered the modifications to be implemented. The alterations were to be carried out as indicated by the judge’s ruling. The judge made it clear that he expected these revisions to be carried out in accordance with his guidance.
The company’s regulatory affairs vice president, Lee-Anne Mulholland, provided the following statement: “We look forward to continuing to make our case on appeal, and we will continue to advocate for what is best for developers, device manufacturers, and the billions of Android users around the world.”
On average, over seventy percent of the total market for smartphones and other mobile devices is comprised of mobile devices that are powered by the Android operating system. Both smartphones and other small mobile devices are included in this category.
In the event that the Play app store continues to be shown on the home page and that other Google applications are pre-installed prior to the installation of the Android application, smartphone manufacturers are entitled to install the Android application at no cost at their discretion.
Additionally, the Android application can be installed on devices that are manufactured for smartphones.
SOURCE: DWN
SEE ALSO:
Over The Planned “Link Tax” Bill, Google Threatens to Remove NZ News Links.
(VOR News) – Those who use WhatsApp now have the ability to mention other people in their stories or status updates as a consequence of a feature that was only recently enabled on the platform.
Previous to this point, this capability was not available. It wasn’t until quite recently that this capability became available to the public.
According to the information that was provided by the company, users now have the opportunity to tag close friends in their stories, and the person who is mentioned will have the option to go back and re-share an earlier version of that story. This information was provided by the company. The corporation was kind enough to reveal this information to us.
Because of a new feature that has been added to the WhatsApp app, users now have the opportunity to like individual stories and status updates.
This capability was previously unavailable to WhatsApp users.
A significant amount of progress has been made in this context. Alternative readers now have the chance to “like” a work, which is comparable to liking a post on Facebook. This feature was introduced in recent years. When compared to the past, this is a tremendous shift.
At one point in time, viewers were only permitted to observe the total number of views that a particular story had gotten. These restrictions were eliminated in later versions of the software.
Additionally, it is essential that the likes and reactions to a story be kept anonymous during the entire process. One of the factors that contributes to the general mystery that surrounds this characteristic is the fact that this is one of the elements.
The person who brought it to the attention of others is the only person who will be able to judge who enjoyed it and who did not care about it. These individuals will be able to make this determination.
A notification will be issued to the individual who was referenced earlier in the sentence and who was named in the story or status update that was discussed. A notification of this nature will be sent to the individual via WhatsApp.
This message will be sent to the user in question whenever that person makes a reference to another person while they are in the process of elaborating on a narrative or updating their status. You will receive a notification alerting you that you have been tagged in the narrative.
This notification will be delivered to the person who receives this message. In addition, students will be provided with the opportunity to re-share the tale for themselves.
It is important to note that if the names of individuals who have been referenced in a narrative or a status update are included in any of these, then the names of those individuals will not be accessible to any third party through any of these. In light of the fact that the identities of those individuals will be concealed from public disclosure, this is the condition that will be required.
While WhatsApp recently made the announcement that it will be incorporating this functionality, it is highly likely that not all users will have access to it at the same time.
This is despite the fact that WhatsApp recently made this announcement.
Despite the fact that WhatsApp has only recently made a public announcement that it will move forward with the deployment, this is the situation that has presented itself.
As soon as a short period of time has elapsed, access will be made available to each and every person on the entire world.
Additionally, WhatsApp has hinted that new functionalities might be introduced to the status and updates tab in the future months.
The purpose of these capabilities is to provide users with assistance in maintaining healthy connections with the individuals who play a vital role in their living experiences. This is done in order to give users with support in maintaining close relationships with the folks who are the subject of the inquiry.
It is with the purpose of supporting users in successfully keeping close ties with the individuals in question that this step is taken.
SOURCE: DN
SEE ALSO:
Over The Planned “Link Tax” Bill, Google Threatens to Remove NZ News Links.
Accenture and NVIDIA Collaborate to Enhance AI Implementation.
(VOR News) – Google has sent a strong message to the New Zealand government, threatening to stop boosting local news content should the Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill become law.
The law, put up by the Labour government and backed by the coalition in power at the moment, mandates that digital companies such as Google pay back news organizations for links to their material.
News publishers, on the other hand, charge the tech giant with “corporate bullying.”
Google says this measure may have unanticipated effects.
Google New Zealand’s country director, Caroline Rainsford, voiced her worries that the law, which is being referred to as a “link tax,” is not doing enough to support the media industry in New Zealand right now.
She underlined that Google would have to make major adjustments if the previously mentioned law were to pass, including cutting off links to news articles from its Search, News, and Discover platforms and cutting off financial ties with regional publications.
According to Rainsford, similar legislation has been proposed and approved in other nations including Australia and Canada, but it has not been proven to be effective there and breaches the principles of the open web.
She drew attention to the fact that smaller media outlets will be most negatively impacted, which will limit their capacity to reach prospective audiences.
Google says its alternative options will protect smaller, local media from negative effects.
Conversely, it conveys apprehension regarding the possible fiscal obligations and vagueness of the legislation, which it feels generates an intolerable level of ambiguity for enterprises functioning within New Zealand.
The New Zealand News Publishers Association (NPA) has reacted to Google’s warnings by alleging that the internet behemoth is using coercive tactics.
They specifically contend that the need for regulation stems from the market distortion that Google and other tech giants have created, which has fueled their expansion into some of the most significant corporations in global history.
The legislation aims to create a more equal framework that media businesses can use to negotiate commercial relationships with technological platforms that profit from their content.
New Zealand Media Editors CEO Michael Boggs stated that he was in favor of the bill, citing the fact that Google now makes a substantial profit from material created by regional publications.
He also emphasized that the use of artificial intelligence by Google—which frequently makes references to news articles without giving credit to the original sources—highlights the significance of enacting legislation.
Paul Goldsmith, the Minister of Media and Communications, has stated that the government is now evaluating various viewpoints and is still in the consultation phase.
He stated that the government and Google have been having continuous talks and will keep up these ongoing discussions.
However, not all political parties accept the validity of the Act.
The ACT Party’s leader, David Seymour, has voiced his displeasure of the proposal, saying that Google is a game the government is “playing chicken” with. He threatened the smaller media companies, saying that they would suffer from worse search engine rankings if the internet giant followed through on its promises.
Seymour contended that it is not the government’s responsibility to shield companies from shifts in the market brought about by consumer preferences.
The things that have happened in other nations are similar to what has happened in New Zealand.
Google has agreements with a number of Australian media firms that are in compliance with its News Media Bargaining Code. These agreements contain provisions that permit an annual cancellation of these agreements.
Due to the government’s decision to exempt Google from the Online News Act, the company has committed to supporting news dissemination by contributing annually to the Canadian journalistic community.
The New Zealand measure is consistent with global approaches aimed at regulating the relationships that exist between technology corporations and media organizations.
It’s hard to say what will happen with the Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill as the discussion goes on. Google and the New Zealand media landscape are preparing for what might be a protracted legal battle.
SOURCE: TET
SEE ALSO:
Accenture and NVIDIA Collaborate to Enhance AI Implementation.
-
News3 years agoLet’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health3 years agoHow Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech2 years agoTop Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles2 years agoAries Soulmate Signs
-
Health2 years agoCan I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Movies2 years agoWhat Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Learning2 years agoVirtual Numbers: What Are They For?