Tech

How Generative AI Is Reshaping Education

Published

1 year ago

January 18, 2024

Freelancer

How Generative AI Is Reshaping Education

The education sector is not a stranger to technology – with tech developments, the transformation of this field becomes evident. It used to be that the only way one could get a college degree was by physically going to college, meeting professors face-to-face, and writing tests within a collegiate setting. But that is not required anymore – thanks to online education, you can get your college degree from wherever you are.

The second innovation that is also becoming widespread in the educational environment today is generative artificial intelligence. For instance, GPT-3 by OpenAI can write essays and produce different types of learning materials in a matter of seconds. All that you have to do is feed it with the right prompt. Moreover, students studying computer science can use AI-enabled systems such as Copilot to create codes.

The above are not the only things that generative AI can create. These systems allow you to generate images, graphs, animations and conduct lab simulations. So, in what way does generative AI revolutionize education? Let us explore the advantages of this technology, ways to overcome its shortcomings, and its future in education.

Facilitates Personalized/Adaptive Learning

Students’ needs are different from person to person. It is based on the fact that students differ in characters – intelligence level, understanding rate of academic content and specific aspects where they need help.

When certain needs of students are considered during the process of teaching, then they learn faster. Unfortunately, the old forms of education tended to use a blanket approach in delivering knowledge. It’s one of the reasons some students struggle with coursework and have to seek help from sites like EssayUSA writing service.

Generative AI can detect students’ abilities exhaustively. In the process, the technology can determine the student’s strengths and weaknesses in specific areas. Take the example of two students – one struggling with algebra and another finding challenges in geometry. For the first case, the system can suggest more algebra questions to help the student improve in this area. The second student then receives more geometry questions. That’s an approach that is personalized based on the needs of the specific students.

How does the data from the generative AI system help educators? Educators can know the specific areas to emphasize when handling students. As a result, students can improve their academic performances.

Moreover, the technology facilitates adaptive learning. Based on the feedback from the system, educators can tell which specific content suits students. They can adjust the curriculum to meet the specific students’ requirements and even the job market.

Fast and Efficient Content Generation

Efficiency is a critical part of the teaching and learning process. For instance, it should be easy for students to find the academic content they’re looking for. Teachers should also find it easy to create a course outline.

In the past, teachers had a lot to do to facilitate the learning process. For instance, they had to determine the topic outlines, come up with specific learning activities, and even draft lesson plans. The time-consuming nature of the teaching process meant teachers did not have time to pay attention to each student’s needs.

Generative AI now makes it easy for teachers to create teaching materials like lesson plans and topic outlines. So, teachers can now save time and energy as they enlighten their students on different topics. As a result, educators find time to help students solve other social challenges they are facing.

Moreover, generative AI systems can suggest interactive learning activities for teachers to use during the learning process. As a result, it makes the learning process more interesting and enjoyable. Consequently, educational outcomes improve.

However, AI generative content isn’t always accurate. So, it’s important for both learners and teachers to assess the generated content carefully and refine it where necessary. Additionally, generating content shouldn’t replace individual creativity.

Another problem is an overreliance on generative AI by students and teachers. For example, students may want to write all their essays using generative AI tools like ChatGPT.

Even though it reduces academic burden like when they pay for essay online, it has some negatives, like killing creativity. It should be made clear the tools are specifically for assisting learning. Teachers and students should still spearhead processes such as:

Research
Innovation
Experimentation and assessment

Fast/Smart Grading of Tests

Free A Woman in a Yellow Jacket Typing on a Laptop Stock Photo

Imagine a situation where a teacher issues a 5-page essay. Assessing such an essay can take several hours. Still, the teacher may find it difficult to give feedback to all the students in good time. Generative AI can make assessment easy and more efficient. Meanwhile, teachers find time to focus on other areas of learning that can’t be automated.

The system assesses the essays quickly and accurately. For instance, it awards grades based on a pre-determined rubric. Moreover, it provides feedback on the specific areas students need to improve. When students work on these areas, they boost their learning outcomes, which translates to improved academic performance.

It’s important to note that generative AI isn’t always accurate in its assessment of academic papers. Teachers still have the responsibility to review the pieces to determine the areas of weakness. However, it will get better as the technology improves. That means it could prove to be a game changer in academic content assessment in the future.

An Excellent Addition to Virtual Simulation

Students love it when they can experience what they learn in real-life situations. Learning theories isn’t enough – you should know the application of these concepts. In some cases, it’s not easy to go to the locations of historical events. That’s where generative AI comes in.

Take an example of students learning about the Egyptian pyramids. They can use virtual reality goggles to explore 3-D images of these magnificent architectural designs. That makes education more realistic and relatable. Moreover, the technology can help students to simulate scientific experiments without necessarily going to physical labs.

Recapping

Generative AI technology is a game-changing tool that is being embraced in education. The technology facilitates customized learning, makes academic content creation easy, and can assess academic work accurately.

Moreover, the technology enables virtual simulation in schools, which makes learning more realistic and interesting. Generative AI technology is undergoing improvements, which means it will get even better in the future. However, while teachers and students can embrace it for better learning outcomes, they shouldn’t over-rely on it.

Tech

US: A Judge Mandates that Google Allow Competing App Stores to Access Android

Published

4 months ago

October 8, 2024

Salman

(VOR News) – The ruling is that Google, the greatest technology firm in the world, is required to make its Android smartphone operating system available to merchants that supply applications that are in direct rivalry with Google’s. This decision was reached by a judge in the United States of America.

The Android Play store, which is owned and operated by Google, was found to be an example of an illegal monopoly arrangement by a jury in the state of California on Monday. The finding was reached by a jury. Monday is the day that this decision was come to.

An earlier federal judge ruled Google’s search engine illegal.

This finding, which came after that decision, has forced the company to suffer yet another setback. As a result of the corporation having already encountered its initial obstacle, this decision has been established. This particular decision was made by the judge during the month of August, when the month was in progress.

In light of the fact that the decision was made, what exactly does it mean that the choice was accepted?

In accordance with the verdict, Google is obligated to make it possible for users to download Android app stores that are offered by third-party competitors. For a period of three years, the corporation is prohibited from imposing restrictions on the usage of payment mechanisms that are integrated into the application.

In addition, it is important to keep in mind that Google does not possess the right to impose restrictions on the utilization of ways to make payments online.

Additionally, the verdict makes it unlawful for Google to give money to manufacturers of smartphones in order to preinstall its app store. Smartphone manufacturers are prohibited from doing so.

Furthermore, it prevents Google from the possibility of sharing the revenue that is generated by the Play store with other companies that are in the industry of delivering mobile applications.

In addition to this, the court has mandated the establishment of a technical committee that will be made up of three different people chosen at random.

The committee will be responsible for monitoring the implementation of the reforms and finding solutions to any disagreements that may occur as a consequence of the implementation of the reforms while they are being implemented. This task will fall under the committee’s purview so that it may fulfill its duties.

However, certain components were allowed to be put into action until July 1st, despite the fact that the judge’s statement suggested that the ruling would take effect on November 1st. The statement was the basis for the ruling, which ultimately became effective.

Particularly, I wanted to know what Google’s reaction would be.

There is a fact that Google does not adhere to this directive, which has been brought to their attention. This document argued that the alterations that the judge had ordered to be made would “cause a range of unintended consequences that will harm American consumers, developers, and device makers.”

The judge had ordered the modifications to be implemented. The alterations were to be carried out as indicated by the judge’s ruling. The judge made it clear that he expected these revisions to be carried out in accordance with his guidance.

The company’s regulatory affairs vice president, Lee-Anne Mulholland, provided the following statement: “We look forward to continuing to make our case on appeal, and we will continue to advocate for what is best for developers, device manufacturers, and the billions of Android users around the world.”

On average, over seventy percent of the total market for smartphones and other mobile devices is comprised of mobile devices that are powered by the Android operating system. Both smartphones and other small mobile devices are included in this category.

In the event that the Play app store continues to be shown on the home page and that other Google applications are pre-installed prior to the installation of the Android application, smartphone manufacturers are entitled to install the Android application at no cost at their discretion.

Additionally, the Android application can be installed on devices that are manufactured for smartphones.

SOURCE: DWN

Tech

WhatsApp Now Features a “Mention” Tool for Status Updates and Stories.

Published

4 months ago

October 6, 2024

Salman

(VOR News) – Those who use WhatsApp now have the ability to mention other people in their stories or status updates as a consequence of a feature that was only recently enabled on the platform.

Previous to this point, this capability was not available. It wasn’t until quite recently that this capability became available to the public.

According to the information that was provided by the company, users now have the opportunity to tag close friends in their stories, and the person who is mentioned will have the option to go back and re-share an earlier version of that story. This information was provided by the company. The corporation was kind enough to reveal this information to us.

Because of a new feature that has been added to the WhatsApp app, users now have the opportunity to like individual stories and status updates.

This capability was previously unavailable to WhatsApp users.

A significant amount of progress has been made in this context. Alternative readers now have the chance to “like” a work, which is comparable to liking a post on Facebook. This feature was introduced in recent years. When compared to the past, this is a tremendous shift.

At one point in time, viewers were only permitted to observe the total number of views that a particular story had gotten. These restrictions were eliminated in later versions of the software.

Additionally, it is essential that the likes and reactions to a story be kept anonymous during the entire process. One of the factors that contributes to the general mystery that surrounds this characteristic is the fact that this is one of the elements.

The person who brought it to the attention of others is the only person who will be able to judge who enjoyed it and who did not care about it. These individuals will be able to make this determination.

A notification will be issued to the individual who was referenced earlier in the sentence and who was named in the story or status update that was discussed. A notification of this nature will be sent to the individual via WhatsApp.

This message will be sent to the user in question whenever that person makes a reference to another person while they are in the process of elaborating on a narrative or updating their status. You will receive a notification alerting you that you have been tagged in the narrative.

This notification will be delivered to the person who receives this message. In addition, students will be provided with the opportunity to re-share the tale for themselves.

It is important to note that if the names of individuals who have been referenced in a narrative or a status update are included in any of these, then the names of those individuals will not be accessible to any third party through any of these. In light of the fact that the identities of those individuals will be concealed from public disclosure, this is the condition that will be required.

While WhatsApp recently made the announcement that it will be incorporating this functionality, it is highly likely that not all users will have access to it at the same time.

This is despite the fact that WhatsApp recently made this announcement.

Despite the fact that WhatsApp has only recently made a public announcement that it will move forward with the deployment, this is the situation that has presented itself.

As soon as a short period of time has elapsed, access will be made available to each and every person on the entire world.

Additionally, WhatsApp has hinted that new functionalities might be introduced to the status and updates tab in the future months.

The purpose of these capabilities is to provide users with assistance in maintaining healthy connections with the individuals who play a vital role in their living experiences. This is done in order to give users with support in maintaining close relationships with the folks who are the subject of the inquiry.

It is with the purpose of supporting users in successfully keeping close ties with the individuals in question that this step is taken.

SOURCE: DN

Tech

Over The Planned “Link Tax” Bill, Google Threatens to Remove NZ News Links.

Published

4 months ago

October 4, 2024

Salman

(VOR News) – Google has sent a strong message to the New Zealand government, threatening to stop boosting local news content should the Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill become law.

The law, put up by the Labour government and backed by the coalition in power at the moment, mandates that digital companies such as Google pay back news organizations for links to their material.

News publishers, on the other hand, charge the tech giant with “corporate bullying.”

Google says this measure may have unanticipated effects.

Google New Zealand’s country director, Caroline Rainsford, voiced her worries that the law, which is being referred to as a “link tax,” is not doing enough to support the media industry in New Zealand right now.

She underlined that Google would have to make major adjustments if the previously mentioned law were to pass, including cutting off links to news articles from its Search, News, and Discover platforms and cutting off financial ties with regional publications.

According to Rainsford, similar legislation has been proposed and approved in other nations including Australia and Canada, but it has not been proven to be effective there and breaches the principles of the open web.

She drew attention to the fact that smaller media outlets will be most negatively impacted, which will limit their capacity to reach prospective audiences.

Google says its alternative options will protect smaller, local media from negative effects.

Conversely, it conveys apprehension regarding the possible fiscal obligations and vagueness of the legislation, which it feels generates an intolerable level of ambiguity for enterprises functioning within New Zealand.

The New Zealand News Publishers Association (NPA) has reacted to Google’s warnings by alleging that the internet behemoth is using coercive tactics.

They specifically contend that the need for regulation stems from the market distortion that Google and other tech giants have created, which has fueled their expansion into some of the most significant corporations in global history.

The legislation aims to create a more equal framework that media businesses can use to negotiate commercial relationships with technological platforms that profit from their content.

New Zealand Media Editors CEO Michael Boggs stated that he was in favor of the bill, citing the fact that Google now makes a substantial profit from material created by regional publications.

He also emphasized that the use of artificial intelligence by Google—which frequently makes references to news articles without giving credit to the original sources—highlights the significance of enacting legislation.

Paul Goldsmith, the Minister of Media and Communications, has stated that the government is now evaluating various viewpoints and is still in the consultation phase.

He stated that the government and Google have been having continuous talks and will keep up these ongoing discussions.

However, not all political parties accept the validity of the Act.

The ACT Party’s leader, David Seymour, has voiced his displeasure of the proposal, saying that Google is a game the government is “playing chicken” with. He threatened the smaller media companies, saying that they would suffer from worse search engine rankings if the internet giant followed through on its promises.

Seymour contended that it is not the government’s responsibility to shield companies from shifts in the market brought about by consumer preferences.

The things that have happened in other nations are similar to what has happened in New Zealand.

Google has agreements with a number of Australian media firms that are in compliance with its News Media Bargaining Code. These agreements contain provisions that permit an annual cancellation of these agreements.

Due to the government’s decision to exempt Google from the Online News Act, the company has committed to supporting news dissemination by contributing annually to the Canadian journalistic community.

The New Zealand measure is consistent with global approaches aimed at regulating the relationships that exist between technology corporations and media organizations.

It’s hard to say what will happen with the Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill as the discussion goes on. Google and the New Zealand media landscape are preparing for what might be a protracted legal battle.

SOURCE: TET