News
Australia’s National Adaptation Plan: Navigating Climate Change Challenges and Building Resilience
(CTN News) – In Australia, most discussions on climate action revolve around emissions reduction. However, cutting emissions is only one aspect of the climate story; Australia must also plan how to adapt to the effects of climate change. Nations’ resilience to climate change is determined by adapting to increasing sea levels, preparing for heatwaves, and managing shifting rainfall patterns.
The floods that devastated north Queensland in December 2023 and northern New South Wales (NSW) in 2022, as well as 2020’s Black Summer bushfires, demonstrate that Australia must step up its conversation about how it intends to adapt to the effects of climate change.
However, in Australia, where climate change has been a long-standing political issue, legislative progress on climate adaptation has been gradual.
As the Australian government prepares to release its Issues Paper for its first National Adaptation Plan in the coming months, it’s a good moment to consider why the country has lagged on climate adaptation legislation — and what’s required to make its plan successful.
National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) are a valuable tool for determining climate adaptation priorities at the country level. They were created to speed up adaptation planning at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) COP16 in 2010. Since then, around 70 countries have developed one.
While the most developed countries (including Finland, Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand) and approximately 40 developing countries (including Chad, Fiji, and Sudan) have produced plans, Australia has made slow progress on climate adaptation.
Under the Morrison Coalition government in 2021, Australia submitted a National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy to the UNFCCC. However, it was never legislated and consisted primarily of existing projects.
The Albanese Labour government pledged a large commitment to climate change adaptation in its 2023-2024 budget, particularly emphasising completing a National Climate Risk Assessment and National Adaptation Plan.
That strategy is already in the works: the government plans to present an Issues Paper in early 2024, following consultations in 2023. This will support broad public consultation throughout 2024, with the NAP expected to be completed in time for the COP29 summit in Baku in November 2024.
Australia has lagged in climate adaptation because climate change and research have long been political footballs.
The country got off to a promising start with the 2007 National Climate Change Adaptation Framework approved by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG), followed by large investments in the National Climate Change Research Facility. However, with a change of government, climate change became a marginalised subject for many years.
When then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison unveiled his 2021 climate adaptation strategy, he was chastised for hiring multinational consulting firm McKinsey, which has advised 43 of the top 100 corporate polluters, to do the modelling rather than Australia’s national science agency, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
Climate adaptation has not been prioritised due to other policy concerns. However, Australia’s poor progress towards building a NAP is partly based on the misconceptions that focusing on adaptation diminishes ambition to cut emissions and that adaptation is primarily a local issue that should be addressed at the local government level.
These are both incorrect. Adaptation and mitigation are both critical climate measures, and all levels of government have a role in adaptation.
These assumptions are currently changing. There are numerous chances for diverse stakeholders to take the lead in climate adaptation. Many state and municipal governments have already produced climate adaptation plans and strategies, indicating a growing awareness that urgent climate adaptation is required.
Critics of the NAP dispute if the Albanese government’s multimillion-dollar expenditure is worthwhile. However, there are various ways in which a true national strategy, rather than just local and state policies, may help Australia.
Without an adaptation strategy, a country would struggle to grasp its risks, priorities, and progress.
Making judgements and national policy without a complete NAP is likely to ignore the effects of climate change, skewing planning budgets by failing to include expenditures for damages.
For example, Australia can commit to long-term infrastructure improvements that appear economically reasonable, but if the effects of climate change on that infrastructure are ignored, the plan will result in increased vulnerability.
Building new roads in a changing environment, for example, means that building materials may need to endure increasing heat in the future, necessitating a different assessment of current and future costs.
Australia’s adaptation strategy has the potential to shed insight into how climate impacts might exacerbate inequality and unfairness across the country due to the uneven distribution of susceptibility.
Without a NAP, policies may present a misleading picture of the causes of inequality and the potential for current policies to address it.
Any growth in inequality can have serious ramifications for people’s security and, possibly, political stability. NAPs are crucial for measuring climate change adaptation progress, especially tracking how climate adaptation impacts the most vulnerable and marginalised communities.
NAPs frequently highlight critical challenges for researchers and industry, indicating where additional study is required to enable evidence-based decisions and the spectrum of the most promising and scalable adaptation solutions and projects that could accelerate adaptation progress and implementation.
Having an NAP does not guarantee progress in climate adaptation. Key questions for Australia include how the plan will be executed and funded and how priorities will be established and scaled to achieve the greatest reductions in vulnerability.
To properly answer these concerns, there must be a strong emphasis on creativity and a varied range of expertise and experience.
Many countries have made climate adaptation a legal requirement to ensure efforts do not stall due to political changes.
The United Kingdom, for example, has a Climate Change Act (2008), which established the Climate Change Committee and the National Adaptation Programme, as well as regulatory reporting methods and timelines.
This strategy recognises that climate adaptation is more than a “nice to have” when a government feels like it; it is a need with long-term policy support. Australia may surely consider this technique.
Moving forward, adaptation to the effects of climate change must be considered in all areas.
Australia’s agriculture sector may need to plan for food insecurity, which could entail modifying or diversifying crops to promote more water-efficient farming.
The energy sector has a long way to go towards climate adaptation. While there are benefits and chances to capitalise on, for example, Australia is the world’s largest supplier of lithium, which is used in batteries; nevertheless, the country is also a major emitter and provider of fossil fuel resources.
It is not just the world’s greatest net exporter of coal but also the largest exporter of liquefied natural gas, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions. Direct mapping of Australia’s emissions and their impact on vulnerability reinforces the need for energy sector change.
There are fears concerning Australia’s distinctive biodiversity. The Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest coral reef, is threatened, and Australia is the only developed country designated as a deforestation hotspot.
Urban planning and emergency management must both adapt. Change is required, from early warning systems to refraining from building in places prone to bushfires or flooding.
Australia must also consider how the changing nature of disasters and long-term trends, such as droughts, put its population in greater danger. These conversations are crucial for towns with firsthand experience with extreme weather occurrences, such as Lismore. Climate resilience consequently entails planning for the future in a way that enables communities in at-risk areas to be safe and healthy.
(CTN News) – The hot air balloon festival that was supposed to take place in London has been postponed for the sixth year in a row due to worries regarding the absence of acceptable weather conditions. It was scheduled to take place in London.
In spite of the fact that the Lord Mayor’s Hot Air Balloon Regatta was supposed to take place in the nation’s capital on Sunday, it was canceled for the fifth year in a row, as well as for the second time this year after it was postponed from July 7 owing to wind conditions.
This is the second time that it has been cancelled this year.
Second year in a row hot air balloons aren’t on the schedule.
The organizers are hopeful that the hot air balloon event, which was due to begin at five in the morning in Battersea Park, may now take place on the 28th of July instead.
This is because the most recent successful event, which took place in 2019, has given them reason to believe that the event would be successful. Previously, the event was scheduled to start at five in the morning, according to the preparations.
As part of the historic activities that will take place during the Lord Mayor’s Show, fifty hot air balloons will take flight across the downtown area of London. The purpose of these flights is to promote awareness and funds for the Lord Mayor’s Appeal.
There will also be a regatta that will be participating in the activities, which will also be included in them. Beginning in the year 2015, the group has been able to effectively raise more than two hundred and fifty thousand pounds.
It has been decided to hot air balloon postpone the activities that were supposed to take place in the years 2020 and 2021 as a result of the global coronavirus epidemic.
On the other hand, the editions that were scheduled to take place in the years 2022 and 2023 have been canceled as a result of the severe weather that has been occurring.
In light of the fact that wind conditions forced them to cancel the flight that was scheduled to take place on Sunday morning, the organizers have now made the announcement that they are hoping to reschedule it for the following Sunday, which is the next of the several possible days that are allocated each year.
This occurs in light of the fact that the flight was supposed to take place on Sunday morning.
Wind conditions forced them to cancel their hot air balloon flight.
In their separate social media accounts, they explained, “Unfortunately, the predicted change in wind direction for the hot air balloon flight today has not materialized, and we have made the difficult decision to cancel the flight for the safety of every member on board,” they stated.
It is our sincerest apologies for any inconvenience this may cause you. It is our sincere apologies for any inconvenience this may cause you.”
We would want to use this opportunity to express our gratitude to everyone who has reached out to us and shown their support, particularly the members of the general public who have communicated with us and attended the trip.
We are moving forward with this, and the next standby date that we are pushing forward with is the next Sunday, which is the 28th of July.
The fact that hot air balloon are going to be floating over a number of well-known locations in London this year has been brought to the attention of the organizers of the event. Some of the most well-known landmarks in London are Buckingham Palace, the London Eye, the Houses of Parliament, the Tower of London, and Tower Bridge.
It is anticipated that Lord Mayor Michael Mainelli would serve as the leader of the ceremony. He will also be the one to lead the ceremony.
SOURCE: IN
SEE ALSO:
A Skydiving Plane in New York Crashed, Killing One Person.
Based on interest from The Range, Homebase’s owner plans to initiate a sale.
Malaysia’s Coast Guard has found the Oil tanker Involved in the Crash off Singapore’s Coast.
(CTN News) – On Saturday, a plane that was being used for skydiving was involved in an accident that resulted in the death of one individual. The event took place in Niagara County, New York.
The occurrence took place at some point throughout the course of the day. Saturday marked the beginning of the investigation into the tragedy that had taken place earlier than anyone had anticipated.
The authorities in New York began their investigation. It turned out that the catastrophe had occurred earlier than anyone had anticipated on their part.
According to a statement that was released by the Federal Aviation Administration, a single-engine Cessna 208B, which was a plane that was used for skydiving, crashed close to Lake Road in the vicinity of Youngstown, New York, at approximately one o’clock in the afternoon. The plane was used for jumping.
The plane served as a platform for skydiving.
In order to perform vertical jumps, the plane was deployed. According to a press statement that was given by the Niagara County Sheriff’s Office on Saturday and reported by News.
the airplane that was used by the Skydive the Falls skydiving center had released all of the divers and was on its way back to land when it crashed.
The statement was issued by the Niagara County Sheriff’s Office. News was the one that distributed the news release. The announcement was made public by CNN, which served as the source.
According to Tammy L. Jones, a representative for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the pilot, who was the only person on board, was reportedly practicing parachute operations before to the accident. Jones stated that the pilot was the only person on board.
The official from the FAA was the one who offered this information here. For more specific information, the Federal Aviation Administration was the source.
However, according to Skydiving Niagara County Sheriff Michael Filicetti, who mentioned this information during a press conference on Saturday, it is still unknown how many divers were on board prior to the disaster.
This information was stated by Filicetti. It was indicated during the press conference that this information was available. Filicetti shared these particulars in his statement, which may be seen here.
It was also indicated in the notice that a brush fire had begun around the crash site later on. This information was included in the warning. Additionally, this was mentioned in the notification that was sent out.
Putting out what Filicetti describes as “a significant fire at that point,” the first squad to arrive on the site was the one responsible for putting out the fire.
The Skydiving fire was to be extinguished by them.
The statement that the sheriff released referred to the plane crash as “an unfortunate incident.” He also noted that local and federal law and Skydiving enforcement officers are collaborating in order to undertake an investigation into the sequence of events that led up to the disaster.
In addition to this, the sheriff mentioned that the investigation will be carried out in conjunction with the federal authorities.
If I am being really honest with you, I am of the opinion that this circumstance is precisely the same as any other emergency-related problem… As soon as you arrived, you decided that you wanted to make an attempt to save people’s lives.
As a result of the specific circumstances that we were dealing with, we were unable to pursue that particular course of action,” Filicetti explained further.
Following an interview with News, Peter Knudson, a spokeswoman for the National Transportation Safety Board, provided the following statement: “It is anticipated that an investigator from the agency will arrive at the crash site on Saturday.”
Knudson, who also confirmed that the investigation will continue, stated that the investigator will continue to Skydiving document the debris of the airplane, which will then be sent to a secure facility for additional examination. Knudson also confirmed that the investigation would continue.
Additionally, Knudson was quoted as saying that the probe will proceed.
According to News, the investigation will Skydiving concentrate on three primary aspects: the pilot, the aircraft, and the environment in which the aircraft is operated throughout the investigation. In this investigation, these are the key aspects that will be looked into.
SOURCE: AP
SEE ALSO:
Malaysia’s Coast Guard has found the Oil tanker Involved in the Crash off Singapore’s Coast.
U.N. Special Rapporteur Calls on Thailand’s Banks to Cut-Off Myanmar Junta
Nearly 1,000 Indian Students Return from Bangladesh Amid Deadly Unrest Over Job Quota System
(CTN News) – A large oil tanker that had been involved in a Coast Guard disastrous collision with another vessel two days ago off the coast of Singapore was discovered and intercepted by the coast guard of Malaysia, according to a statement that was made on Sunday.
The disaster occurred off the coast of Singapore with another vessel. There had been an accident that took place two days previously.
The disaster had occurred the day before, with the occurrence taking place off the coast of Singapore. The calamity had taken place just the day before. Two days previously, the accident had also taken place in the vicinity of Singapore’s coast.
Also affected was the neighborhood. Indeed, this was the fact. At the time of the accident, Singapore and Malaysia were both taken aback by the magnitude of the catastrophe that had taken place off the beaches of their respective countries.
According to a Coast Guard report on Saturday.
At least two members of the crew have been injured after a collision involving the tanker Ceres I, which was flying the flag of Sao Tome and Principe, caused a fire and resulted in the vessel leaving the scene of the accident.
A report on the findings of the study has been released. According to the report, the tanker had moved away from the location where the event occurred.
We received the information from the United States Coast Guard, which was the entity that provided it to us. The report states that the tanker was reported to have left the location where the event took place. This information is according to the report.
Additionally, it was believed that the ship had disabled its tracking system, as stated by the Coast Guard. Specifically, this was mentioned in the report. Within the report that was made public, this particular point was brought to the forefront.
It was reported that the Ceres I was found in the waters of Malaysia when it was being hauled by two tugboats, as indicated in a statement that was made by the Coast Guard on Sunday, proclaiming the discovery. The statement was released in order to announce the finding.
The statement provided an explanation as to how the discovery turned out. Following the discovery that was reported, the remark was made as a response to the situation.
It has been reported that the Coast Guard has taken two tugboats and the Ceres I into custody in order to undertake more investigations.
Based on Coast Guard information provided in the article.
This type of detention is being carried out in order to guarantee that the Coast Guard will be able to conduct an appropriate investigation into the sequence of events that led up to the tragedy.
The United States Coast Guard issued a statement on Sunday stating that aerial scans that were carried out by the Coast Guard discovered minute residues of an oil spill near the site of the collision between the Ceres I and the Hafnia Nile, which happened to be flying the flag of Singapore at the time of the collision.
The statement was issued in response to the fact that the Coast Guard had discovered the oil spill. The collision that occurred between the two vessels was the initial cause of the oil spill.
The announcement was made available to the general public by the Coast Guard not long after that. The statement was issued by the Coast Guard, which was the specific organization that issued the statement.
It was noted in the release that “the environment department has been informed and will conduct further monitoring,” which is the same thing that was expressed in the warning. This was done in order to convey a better level of clarity.
SOURCE: USN
SEE ALSO:
Bangladesh Supreme Court to Rule on Controversial Job Quotas Amid Nationwide protests
U.N. Special Rapporteur Calls on Thailand’s Banks to Cut-Off Myanmar Junta
Nearly 1,000 Indian Students Return from Bangladesh Amid Deadly Unrest Over Job Quota System
-
News3 years agoLet’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health3 years agoHow Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech1 year agoTop Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles2 years agoAries Soulmate Signs
-
Health2 years agoCan I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Movies2 years agoWhat Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Learning2 years agoVirtual Numbers: What Are They For?