Connect with us

Health

Mesothelioma Myths That People Still Believe

Published

on

Mesothelioma Myths That People Still Believe
Mesothelioma is a particular form of cancer

Mesothelioma is a particular form of cancer, often spurred by asbestos exposure. It’s rare. It’s deadly and known to be extremely aggressive, spreading to other areas of the body rapidly. While scientists have a much better understanding of mesothelioma than they ever have before, there’s still a lot we don’t understand about this disease – and there are a lot of myths and misconceptions about mesothelioma that continue to circulate in public.

If you want to protect your own health, minimize your mesothelioma risks, or simply better understand the disease, it’s important to be able to recognize and dispel these myths and misconceptions.

mesothelioma

Mesothelioma Myths That People Still Believe

These are some of the most pervasive myths and misconceptions about mesothelioma:

1. Mesothelioma is a lung disease only. It’s true that mesothelioma most commonly affects the lungs, or more specifically, the mesothelial lining of the lungs. However, it’s also possible for mesothelioma to develop in other areas of the body. For example, in peritoneal mesothelioma, the cancer affects the lining of the stomach. In pericardial mesothelioma, the cancer affects the lining of the heart.

2. Mesothelioma is just another term for lung cancer. Because of its association with lungs, some people believe that mesothelioma is just another term for lung cancer. While plural mesothelioma can be categorized as a type of cancer that affects the lungs, traditional lung cancer is a totally different disease.

3. You can get mesothelioma from smoking. Similarly, some people mistakenly assume that mesothelioma can be developed as a result of a smoking habit. It’s definitely true that smoking increases your lung cancer risk, and mesothelioma does share many symptoms with traditional lung cancers. However, your risk of developing mesothelioma from smoking is practically zero.

4. Only direct contact with asbestos can cause mesothelioma. In nearly all cases, mesothelioma develops as a result of asbestos exposure. However, many people in the general public assume that only direct contact with asbestos can cause mesothelioma. In reality, inhaling even a single asbestos fiber can greatly increase your mesothelioma risk, so even secondary asbestos exposure can be problematic.

5. Asbestos is now fully banned and never used in the U.S. Now that we understand how risky asbestos is, the material is banned everywhere in this country, right? Unfortunately, that’s not necessarily the case. While asbestos has been banned in many applications, it’s still in industrial use. Asbestos can also be found in more than 3,000 consumer products that could still be in use in your home.

6. Most people working with asbestos knew the risks. It’s tempting to think that everyone working with asbestos in decades past knew about the risks associated with this material. But this doesn’t seem to be the case. In fact, we didn’t have a clear understanding of the full risks of asbestos until the 1980s. Many people worked with this material without knowing what they were getting themselves into.

7. Asbestos needs to be removed as soon as possible in all cases. If you find asbestos anywhere, you should remove it right away, right? This is a tempting thought, given the risks associated with this material. However, there are some cases where attempting to remove the asbestos can introduce more risk, as it can disturb the material and send fibers into the air. That’s why it’s always important to hire an asbestos remediation professional to inspect the area before doing anything.

8. A mask is ample to prevent mesothelioma. If you’re working with asbestos, you should definitely wear protective gear. However, don’t fall into the trap of thinking that a simple mask is going to suffice. You need specially rated equipment if you’re going to handle or work in an environment with asbestos.

9. Mesothelioma is exclusive to elderly people. Mesothelioma typically takes many years, and sometimes even decades to develop. Accordingly, many people who have mesothelioma are elderly. But this isn’t exclusively the case; in fact, there have been documented cases of teenagers developing this deadly disease.

10. Treating mesothelioma is a waste of time. Because mesothelioma is an aggressive, deadly disease that is almost always fatal, people sometimes mistakenly believe that treating mesothelioma is a waste of time. In reality, successful mesothelioma treatments can help people live for years beyond their diagnosis – and improve their quality of life.

11. The risks of mesothelioma have been overstated. We’ve all seen dramatic mesothelioma commercials, but it’s a mistake to think that the risks of asbestos exposure and mesothelioma have been overstated or exaggerated. Every year, roughly 3,000 Americans are diagnosed with mesothelioma – and many of them don’t last a year after getting their diagnosis.

Increasing Your Personal Knowledge

The more you understand about mesothelioma, the better you’ll be able to guard yourself and others against it. You’ll also be in a position to better support anyone in your life who does develop this aggressive disease. We may never be able to cure mesothelioma, and we may never fully understand it, but we can inch closer to these ideals with more research and better public education.

SEE ALSO:

Health Officials Combat the Use and Addiction of e-Cigarettes

Pfizer’s 4 Focus Areas Will Produce 8 Blockbuster Cancer Drugs

Continue Reading

Health

Report Causes Pfizer Stock to Climb Approximately $1 Billion Acquired by Starboard

Published

on

By

Pfizer

(VOR News) – According to a rumor that activist investor Pfizer Starboard Value has taken a holding in the struggling pharmaceutical business that is expected to be worth around one billion dollars, the stock of Pfizer (PFE) is on the increase in premarket trading on Monday.

This comes after the report was made public. The report was made available to the general public following this. Starboard Value was successful in moving forward with the acquisition of the position.

Starboard is said to have approached Ian Read, a former chief executive officer of Pfizer, and Frank D’Amelio, a former chief financial officer, in order to seek assistance with its goals of boosting the performance of the company, according to the Wall Street Journal. Read and D’Amelio are both former Pfizer executives.

The purpose of this is to facilitate the accomplishment of its objectives, which include enhancing the overall performance of the firm.

In their previous jobs, D’Amelio and Read were chief financial officers.

It is stated in the report that the hedge fund is of the opinion that Pfizer, which is currently being managed by Albert Bourla, who succeeded Read as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in 2019, does not demonstrate the same level of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) discipline that Read did. Bourla took over for Read in 2019. Read was succeeded by Bourla in the year 2019.

Pfizer, a multinational pharmaceutical conglomerate, has made substantial investments in the acquisition of more companies that are involved in the research and development of cancer medicines.

These businesses have been acquired for billions of dollars. The biotechnology company Seagen, which was acquired by Pfizer in the previous year for a price of $43 billion, is included in this category. One of the businesses that can be classified as belonging to this category is Seagen.

In spite of the fact that the S&P 500 Index experienced a 21% increase in 2024.

No major trading occurred in Pfizer stock that year.

Due to the fact that the demand for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines fell after the firm reached its pandemic peak in 2021, the share price of the corporation has decreased by over fifty percent since that time.

This drop has occurred ever since the company’s shares reached their maximum peak, which was during the time that this decline occurred. Not only have they not changed at all, but they have also remained essentially stable. This is in contrast to the S&P 500, which has gained 21% since the beginning of this year.

Recently, the corporation was forced to take a hit when it decided to recall all of the sickle cell illness medications that it had distributed all over the world.

Fears that the prescription could lead patients to experience severe agony and possibly even death were the impetus for the decision to recall the product. In spite of the fact that Pfizer’s stock is increasing by almost three percent as a result of the news that followed the company’s decision, this is the circumstance that has come about.

SOURCE: IPN

SEE ALSO:

New Study Reveals Drinking Soda Pop Increases the Risk of Stroke

The Mpox Vaccine’s Protection Decreases Within a Year; Booster Requirements

 

Continue Reading

Health

New Study Reveals Drinking Soda Pop Increases the Risk of Stroke

Published

on

By

Soda Pop Increases the Risk of Stroke
If you drink too much soda, fruit juice and coffee, beware!

A recent report from global research indicates that excessive consumption of coffee or soda pop is associated with an increased risk of stroke, although the intake of black and green tea is correlated with a reduced risk. Excessive consumption of soda pop or coffee warrants caution!

Recent research indicates that it may substantially elevate the risk of stroke.

Consuming four cups of coffee daily elevates the risk of stroke, according to studies, although ingesting 3-4 cups of black or green tea daily typically offers protection against stroke. Additionally, consume more coffee; it may reduce your risk of mortality.

Recent findings from global research studies co-led by the University of Galway and McMaster University, alongside an international consortium of stroke researchers, indicate that soda, encompassing both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened variants such as diet or zero sugar, is associated with a 22 percent heightened risk of stroke. The risk escalated significantly with the consumption of two or more of these beverages daily.

Stroke Risk Fizzy Drinks and Soda Pop

The correlation between fizzy drinks consumption and stroke risk was most pronounced in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South America. Women exhibit the most elevated risk of stroke from bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage) associated with fruit juice beverages. Consuming over 7 cups of water daily diminishes the likelihood of stroke due to a clot.

Researchers observed that numerous items advertised as fruit juice are derived from concentrates and have added sugars and preservatives, potentially negating the advantages often associated with fresh fruit and instead elevating stroke risk.

Fruit juice beverages were associated with a 37 percent heightened risk of stroke resulting from bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage). Consuming two of these beverages daily increases the risk thrice.

Consuming over four cups of coffee daily elevates the risk of stroke by 37 percent, although lower consumption levels do not correlate with stroke risk. Conversely, tea consumption was associated with an 18-20 percent reduction in stroke risk. Additionally, consuming 3-4 cups daily of black tea, such as Breakfast and Earl Grey varieties, excluding green and herbal teas, was associated with a 29 percent reduced risk of stroke.

Consuming 3-4 cups of green tea daily was associated with a 27 percent reduction in stroke risk. Notably, the addition of milk may diminish or inhibit the advantageous effects of antioxidants present in tea. The lower risk of stroke associated with tea consumption was negated for individuals who added milk.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational reasons and should not be considered a replacement for professional medical counsel. Consistently consult your physician regarding any inquiries pertaining to a medical problem.

Related News:

Starbucks Faces Sales Decline Amid Price Fatigue and Rising Competition

Starbucks Faces Sales Decline Amid Price Fatigue and Rising Competition

Continue Reading

Health

Following a Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, What Else Should You Know?

Published

on

By

Breast Cancer

(VOR News) – Even though breast cancer affects one in eight American women, receiving a diagnosis can make a woman feel isolated.

Experts in breast cancer from the American College of Physicians (ACS) advise patients on how to manage their disease so that they may better cope with this awful information.

First, the kind and stage of breast cancer dictates the course of your care.

In addition to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, there are various surgical options available for the treatment of breast cancer.

Women of African descent are disproportionately affected by triple-negative breast cancer, an extremely aggressive form of the disease that has never proven easy to treat.

According to the American Cancer Society, pembrolizumab (Keytruda), an immunotherapy, has been shown to be helpful when combined with chemotherapy and is currently the recommended course of treatment for certain combinations of triple-negative breast cancer.

In her presentation, Dr. Katharine Yao said, “It’s really important that the patient and physician discuss the patient’s preferences and values when deciding what type of treatment to pursue and that they have an honest, individualized discussion with their care team.”

She is currently responsible for developing breast cancer treatment recommendations for more than 575 hospitals and institutions nationwide in her role as chair of the American College of Surgeons’ National Accreditation Program for Breast Institutions (NAPBC).

Yao, vice chair of research at Endeavor Health NorthShore Hospitals in New York, pointed out that each decision made about a patient’s treatment plan should take her preferences and diagnosis into consideration.

She ought to think about whether she would prefer a mastectomy—a surgical procedure that involves removing the entire breast with or without reconstruction—or a lumpectomy, which involves a surgical procedure that spares part of the breast tissue.

She stated that “the breast cancer you have may be very different from the breast cancer you hear about in your neighbor, colleague, or friend” in a press release issued by the American Cancer Society (ACS).

“Consider that while discussing breast cancer with others.”

Throughout your journey, it is critical that you look after your emotional health because having breast cancer may have a detrimental impact on your mental health.

“Getting a cancer diagnosis does not mean that everything in your life stops to be normal.” Director of the Fellowship in the Diseases of the Breast program at the Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute at the University of Arkansas and state head of the American Cancer Society Commission on Cancer for Arkansas, Dr. Daniela Ochoa She thinks adding the burden of a cancer diagnosis and treatment to all the other pressures in life may be taxing.

“Managing stress and emotional health is vital component of a treatment plan.”

Ochoa recommends clinically trained psychologists and social workers who have assisted people in coping with cancer to anyone receiving treatment. Learning coping techniques might also be facilitated by joining cancer support groups or cancer wellness initiatives.

Breast cancer specialists say your care team is crucial.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) defines comprehensive care as having support at every stage of the procedure from surgeons, oncologists, patient navigators, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and other specialists.

After receiving a breast cancer diagnosis, women should see a surgeon or medical oncologist to explore their options; nevertheless, treatment shouldn’t be discontinued after just one appointment or after surgery is over.

Additionally, you can ask trustworthy friends or family members to accompany you to appointments and aid you with research or notes. They could serve as a network of support for you.

Yao stated in his talk that “one of the most important things is that patients should search out a team they have confidence in, that they trust will have their back when they need it, and a team they feel they can get access to and that will help them when they are in need.”

SOURCE: MP

SEE ALSO:

The Mpox Vaccine’s Protection Decreases Within a Year; Booster Requirements

COVID was a Paradigm Shift in Health Policymaking, Says Commissioner Stella Kyriakides.

Rwanda Reports 8 Deaths Linked To Ebola-Like Marburg Virus Days After It Declared An Outbreak

 

Continue Reading

Trending