Connect with us

Covid-19

COVID is having a Problem in the Future

Published

on

COVID is having a Problem in the Future

COVID-19 is no more dangerous than a serious cold or flu to a vast majority of people on the planet, is it not?

Those are the accusations and counter-arguments that many of the critics and the anti-mandate folks have been making for a long time.

Is it really a big deal if they are right?

As things stand, it would appear that they are just as bad as they seem if recent actions by the B.C. government are anything to go by.

Neil Godbout is managing editor of The Prince George Citizen. Brent Braaten

Neil Godbout is managing editor of The Prince George Citizen.
Brent Braaten

Updates on a daily basis are no longer provided. Data is no longer systematically collected on a daily basis. The masks and vaccine passports are no longer used. There is a return to large events. It is up to you to take any necessary precautions. To paraphrase the words of a wise woman, be kind, be calm, and be safe and secure at the same time.

Must Read: Thailand Reports Over Half of Children Killed By Omicron Under 5 Years Old

Despite the fact that COVID-19 and its variants are as widespread across Ontario as they have ever been, infection rates are still high, people are still dying of these diseases, and the virus – in all of its forms – seems set to stay.

How has the situation changed? It is evident that a large part of the population was vaccinated at least once or twice and a large portion of the population had a booster as well. Did all of this vaccination prove necessary? Were the lockdown, the vaccine, and the mandate actually able to help in the matter? If we were able to remove our masks three or six months ago, would we have had any better results? In this case, would it have been better to eliminate all masks, maintain occupancy limits and distances at stores and events, and encourage people to shop alone instead of in large groups?

Must Read: China Reports 3,297 New COVID Cases, On Verge Of a National Crisis

Government and public health officials need to provide answers to these legitimate questions, not only for what has happened in the past two years, but also for what will occur in the future. There are almost eight billion people in the world at the present time. Over half of them live in crowded urban areas, making it inevitable that a previously undiscovered virus will surface again sooner than we think.

For the majority of people, responding properly, especially if the virus that follows is much more deadly, requires that they put their trust in what their leaders and public health officials are telling them.

We have to earn that trust by admitting our mistakes over COVID-19 and making amends for them.

Must Read: French Government to Abolish COVID Passport Requirement on March 14

COVID-19 had a major impact around the world two years ago, as obvious from the overflowing hospitals around the globe at that time. The virus later spread to hospitals, nursing homes and care facilities, causing havoc on them. People died alone both in hospitals as well as in nursing homes and care facilities. It was at least fortunate for those who were fortunate enough to be able to be with their families and friends in their last moments through Zoom and FaceTime.

According to the World Health Organization, more than a billion people contract the flu each year, and between 300,000 and 600,000 people die as a result. As reported Wednesday, Johns Hopkins University’s COVID-19 dashboard shows that some 500 million people have had COVID and 6.2 million have died over the past two years. If the last two years were viewed from a historical and a global perspective, would they be comparable to a really bad flu season?

Must Read: Mental illness May Increase COVID-19 Risk, Study Finds

Hopefully future researchers will be able to get to the bottom of this in the future. Even at the best of times, it is notoriously hard to determine the cause of death, and last week in Ontario, the province changed the rules on how they record deaths caused by COVID-19.

It is okay to make changes to your response and to apologise for errors. If Health Minister Adrian Dix and Dr. Bonnie Henry were to apologize for their misidentifications and errors after a thorough review of the COVID-19 response, it would go a long way to restoring confidence in both of them. It would begin with the decisions they made that were based on guesses, not analyses. If a mysterious new virus makes many people ill and a lot of people die from it, it’s reasonable to expect the worst. Yet the majority of cases recovered, even before the vaccine was developed and widely circulated, which would seem to suggest that it was reasonable to expect the worst? Was it the best or the most reasonable thing to do in that situation?

As well as the broader social issues, there are also a number of other issues that need to be addressed.

Did the two years of focused effort on COVID-19 put at risk addressing the far more dangerous (in B.C. and Canada, for sure) and much more difficult epidemic of opioid addiction and toxic drug overdoses on top of the priority given to COVID-19? Does B.C. , as well as the rest of Canada, have enough hospital beds and does the number of physicians and nurses, especially in the rural areas, meet its needs? In the event of an emergency, what changes need to be made to the global supply chain so that the few countries that make drugs, masks, ventilators, and other essential medical equipment aren’t able to hog them all and/or charge exorbitant prices for them? I would like to know how much stockpiling is required, what type we will have to do and how much it will cost us.

In these circumstances, why did the rich get richer while remaining safe and isolated in isolation while the working class kept going to work and lost a lot more ground as a result of the pandemic? What is it about multinational corporations that insist governments stay out of their way, but when the market is not able to fix their problems, they are the ones who come crying for help and bailouts?

We have to be able to recognize that all of these questions are healthy, and the more that we can address them head-on, the better off humanity will be the next time around.

Continue Reading

Covid-19

WHO Reveals FLiRT Variants as Predominant SARS-CoV-2 Strains in 2024

Published

on

WHO Reveals FLiRT Variants as Predominant SARS-CoV-2 Strains in 2024

(CTN News) – The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that the “FLiRT” versions of the fatal SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19 illnesses, are the most common virus strains this year worldwide.

According to Gulf News, the moniker “FLiRT” refers to the shared mutations on the virus’s spike protein among the variations.

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, KP.2, one of the FLiRT variants, has become the most regularly circulating variant in the United States in the last month.

Johns Hopkins University says that the FLiRT variations, which include KP.2’s “parental” lineage JN.1, have three important changes on their spike protein that may help them avoid being caught by antibodies.

Are the FLiRT variations more contagious?

Dr. Aaron Glatt, a representative for the Infectious Diseases Society of America, stated that based on the data he collects and experiences with his own patients, he has seen no evidence of an increase in disease or hospitalizations.

“There have been some significant changes in the variants, but I think in recent times it’s not been as important, probably because of the immunity many, many people already have” due to vaccinations and previous illnesses.

According to CDC data, COVID-19-related hospitalizations have been declining in recent weeks.

Furthermore, the number of patients in emergency rooms who tested positive for COVID-19 has been rather stable over the last month.

Continue to evolve before winter, when infections and hospitalizations often peak, and whether the FLiRT strains will be included in a fall COVID-19 vaccine.

Dr. Roberts answers three questions about the FLiRT variations.

1. Where did the FLiRT strains originate?

Nobody knows where the FLiRT variations first appeared. The CDC initially discovered them in wastewater in the United States, where it screens sewage for signs of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in a community, even if patients do not have symptoms. (The data can be utilized to provide an early warning if infection levels in a community are increasing or decreasing.). FLiRT strains have since been discovered in several other nations, including Canada and the United Kingdom.

To better appreciate how the FLiRT strains developed, consider how the SARS-CoV-2 virus has evolved, with new varieties developing when mutations occur in its genetic coding. Omicron was a SARS-CoV-2 variant that became prevalent in the United States in 2021 and began to produce its subvariants. One of these was JN.1, which was discovered in September 2023 and spread across the country during the winter months, increasing COVID-19 hospitalizations. JN.1 has offspring, including the FLiRT subvariants, which are spinoffs of JN.1.11.1.

2. What do we know—and don’t know—about the FLiRT variants?

We know that the FLiRT variations had two changes in their spike proteins (the spike-shaped protrusions on the virus’s surface) that were not present in JN.1 (the previously prevalent strain in the United States). Some specialists believe that these alterations may allow the virus to avoid people’s protection, whether from the vaccination or a previous bout with COVID.

However, Dr. Roberts believes that the FLiRT variations’ genetic similarity to JN.1 should be reassuring. “While JN.1 occurred during the winter months, when people gather indoors and the virus is more likely to spread, its symptoms were milder than those caused by variants in the early years of the pandemic,” according to him.

There is no word yet on whether a COVID sickness will be more severe with the FLiRT variations or how symptoms may vary. Because everyone is different, a person’s symptoms and severity of COVID disease are largely determined by their immunity and overall health rather than the variant with which they are infected, according to the CDC.

3. How can people defend themselves from FLiRT strains?

Dr. Roberts emphasizes the importance of vaccination as a critical tactic against COVID-19. He recommends that all eligible individuals stay up to date on their immunizations. While immunization does not guarantee immunity, it does dramatically reduce a person’s risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19.

“We know that the updated monovalent vaccine, which was designed for the XBB.1.5 variant, worked against JN.1, and I strongly suspect it will have some degree of activity against the FLiRT mutations as well,” adds Dr. Roberts.

“I would especially recommend anyone who qualifies for the vaccine because of advanced age get it if they haven’t already,” says Dr. Roberts. “The reason is that the biggest risk factor for a bad outcome from COVID is advanced age.” In the fall of 2023, eligible individuals over 65 can receive the first shot of the revised vaccine and then another shot four months later.

He also believes COVID testing will be able to detect FLiRT strains, and antiviral medications will continue to be effective against them. Paxlovid, the primary treatment for most COVID patients, targets a “nonspiked part of the virus,” he explains. “It’s relatively variant-proof, so it should act against many future COVID iterations.”

Additional preventive measures can assist. To prevent COVID-19, avoiding direct contact with sick people, wearing a mask, washing your hands thoroughly, enhancing ventilation, and monitoring transmission levels in your area is important. Additional options are available on the CDC website.

Continue Reading

Covid-19

New Omicron Subvariants, KP.2 and KP.3, Dominate in Canada: What You Need to Know

Published

on

New Omicron Subvariants, KP.2 and KP.3, Dominate in Canada What You Need to Know

(CTN News) – More than four years after COVID-19 effectively shut down the world, two new versions of the unique coronavirus have emerged as the dominant strain in Canada.

These new subvariants, KP.2 and KP.3, are classified as Omicron mutations originating from the COVID-19 virus. As of May 19, 49.2% of COVID-19 cases in Canada involved one of these strains, indicating their rapid expansion.

But how much do these subvariants affect the human body? Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious diseases specialist at Toronto General Hospital, believes that while it is too early to say, the most likely outcome is no.

“It’s going to cause predictable symptoms, just like the other sublineages of Omicron,” Bogoch told CTVNews.ca. “Some people will have more serious infection, some will have a milder infection, and some will have no symptoms at all.”

Bogoch, an associate professor at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Medicine, says the virus’s impact will vary depending on each individual, with factors such as age, health, and underlying medical disorders all playing a role.

Public Health Outlook in Canada

He also claims that the current set of vaccines continues “to do a remarkable job in reducing the risk of serious infection.” Thus, even though the most recent boosters do not account for these new varieties, they still protect the most vulnerable individuals.

However, in the first few months of the subvariant’s existence, there has been no indication that Canadians or public health experts should be concerned.

“The first Omicron wave was terrible, back in late 2021 and early 2022,” he stated. “However, subsequent Omicron waves have had fewer and fewer effects on our healthcare system and society.”

“Of course, this is not to diminish the importance of COVID. “It’s terrible, and certain populations are particularly vulnerable,” he added. “(Both federal and provincial) Public health can do a lot of good by having clear, open, transparent conversations with the general public, just discussing what the current state of COVID-19 is.”

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 03: People line up outside of a free COVID-19 vaccination site that opened today in the Hubbard Place apartment building on December 3, 2021 in Washington, DC. The DC Department of Health is stepping up vaccination and booster shots as more cases of the Omicron variant are being discovered in the United States. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

Cases have been quite low in the spring and summer, as in the previous few COVID-19 and flu seasons before 2020, before increasing in the autumn and winter.

Bogoch expects the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, Canada’s primary authority on vaccine use, to issue guidelines in the autumn. New COVID-19 injections will be available around the same time as influenza vaccines.

While Canadians have begun to adjust to life after years of pandemic restrictions, cautious optimism is present in the post-COVID world.

Continue Reading

Covid-19

Researchers Found Two Extremely Rare Side Effects of the COVID-19 Vaccine

Published

on

Researchers Found Two Extremely Rare Side Effects of the COVID-19 Vaccine

(CTN News) – As millions of people receive their doses of the Covid-19 vaccine, the world is in a race against time to combat the disease. Vaccines have emerged as an integral part of the fight against this pandemic, so ensuring the safety of these vaccines has become increasingly important. As a result of recent studies, it is now known that there are two rare side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, which adds another layer of complexity to the vaccination campaign.

Side effects of the Covid-19 vaccine

Vaccination safety is a broad topic that must be understood before we look at these rare side effects in detail. Common side effects, such as sore arms, fatigue, and mild fever, are well-documented and usually short-lived. Despite the sheer scale of the vaccination campaigns for COVID-19, continuous monitoring is required to identify any unexpected adverse events that may occur.

The Study

The purpose of this study was to analyze data from vaccinated individuals and identify any patterns that might be unusual. The study’s methodology and the diverse pool of participants provided an opportunity to understand potential risks related to vaccines.

Rare Side Effect #1: Allergic Reactions

There have been uncommon allergic reactions following vaccination as one of the rare side effects identified. Even though allergic reactions can vary in severity, the study found instances of uncommon allergic reactions following vaccination. To ensure the safety of vaccine recipients, it is crucial to understand the types and frequency of these reactions.

Rare Side Effect #2: Myocarditis

It is also important to recognize and address the possibility of myocarditis, another rare side effect highlighted by the study, as an inflammation of the heart muscle. Although this is a rare consequence of the treatment, the study emphasizes the importance of recognizing it and addressing it if it occurs.

Impact on Different Age Groups

According to the study, age appears to significantly influence the prevalence of these rare side effects. Also, the study indicates differences in side effects between different age groups, which leads to tailored recommendations for vaccine recipients of varying ages.

Recognizing Symptoms

If you recognize symptoms, you can treat these rare side effects promptly. From allergic reactions to signs of myocarditis, being aware of the warning signs makes it easier for you to seek medical attention right away.

Treatment and Prevention

Although medical interventions for these rare side effects exist, preventive measures can also be taken to protect those at higher risk from experiencing these side effects. Healthcare providers and the general public must be aware of these available choices.

Importance of Reporting Side Effects

Encouraging the public to report any adverse reactions to vaccines is important for ongoing COVID-19vaccine safety monitoring. This collaborative effort between the public and healthcare professionals facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the side effects of vaccines.

Public Awareness Campaigns

The importance of public awareness campaigns plays a vital role in addressing public concerns and misunderstandings. Educating the public about the potential side effects of vaccination and their context and rarity is crucial for maintaining trust in vaccines.

Regulatory Responses

As a result of these findings, health authorities are actively responding to them, adjusting vaccination guidelines and communicating transparently with the public regarding the measures taken to ensure public safety.

Balancing Risks and Benefits

COVID-19Vaccine safety remains a cornerstone of the ongoing assessment of the overall safety of vaccines in the prevention of severe illness and deadly diseases, as it is crucial to balance the risks against the benefits of vaccination in order to make informed decisions.

Future Research Directions

A continued focus is being put on the evaluation of vaccination safety, with a focus on refining vaccination strategies and addressing emerging concerns. The commitment to continual improvement ensures that vaccination programs remain as safe and effective as possible.

Conclusion

As a result, it is imperative to maintain public trust in vaccination efforts if we are to understand and address rare side effects. To avoid the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate its impact, widespread vaccination has proven to be extremely beneficial, and ongoing research and monitoring has enhanced our ability to navigate the complexities associated with COVID-19 vaccine safety.

Continue Reading

Trending