Health
AstraZeneca Admits Side Effects of Covid Vaccine: Court Documents Reveal Rare Blood Clot Risk
(CTN News) – AstraZeneca has confessed in court for the first time that its COVID-19 vaccine can cause fatal blood clotting adverse effects.
The incredibly rare reaction is at the heart of a multimillion-pound class action filed by hundreds of families who claim they or their loved ones were injured or murdered by the pharmaceutical giant’s ‘defective’ vaccination.
Lawyers for the claimants believe some cases could be worth up to £20 million in compensation.
AstraZeneca, the company opposing the claims, admitted in a February court statement to the High Court that their vaccination ‘may, in extremely rare situations, induce TTS’.
TTS stands for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, a medical disorder in which a person has blood clots with a low platelet count. Platelets help the blood clot.
The issue, listed as a potential side effect of the vaccination, was formerly known as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).
AstraZeneca’s admission could result in individual payouts.
The business has confessed in court for the first time that its jab can trigger the disease after being aware of the potential negative effects for two years, according to The Telegraph.
Taxpayers will bear the cost of any prospective payout due to an indemnification agreement AstraZeneca made with the government during the Covid pandemic to expedite vaccine production when the country was under lockdown.
It comes just days after the company reported revenue topping £10 billion in the first quarter of 2024, representing a 19 percent increase. Officials noted that the company had had a very strong start to the year.
Jamie Scott, a father of two and an IT engineer, is one of the individuals seeking compensation for injuries related to AstraZeneca’s vaccination.
He had a lifelong brain injury as a result of a blood clot and a brain bleed after receiving the vaccine in April 2021. He’s been unable to work since.
His is one of 51 pending claims in the High Court, claiming damages totaling over £100 million.
Kate Scott, Mr Scott’s wife, commented on the development, saying, “I hope their admission means we will be able to sort this out sooner rather than later.”
‘We require an apology and reasonable compensation for our family and other families who have been impacted. We have the truth on our side and refuse to give up.
Sarah Moore, a partner at law firm Leigh Day representing claimants against AstraZeneca (AZ), accused the business of utilizing delaying tactics on victims.
She stated, “Unfortunately, it appears that AZ, the government, and their lawyers are more interested in playing strategic games and incurring legal fees than in seriously dealing with the devastating impact that their AZ vaccine has had on our clients’ lives.”
AstraZeneca said, ‘ Our hearts go out to anyone who has lost loved ones or reported health difficulties.
‘Patient safety is our top priority, and regulatory authorities have established clear and severe requirements for the safe use of all medicines, including vaccinations.
‘Based on the body of evidence from clinical trials and real-world data, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has consistently been shown to have an acceptable safety profile, and regulators worldwide consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.
The fresh documents filed to the court differ from AstraZeneca’s prior submissions last year, which argued that their jab could not cause TSS’ at a generic level’.
According to the new submission, the trigger for TSS from the AstraZeneca jab is unknown and can occur in persons without the vaccine.
It states, ‘ Causation in every individual case will be a topic for expert evidence.’
In legal documents, AstraZeneca denies making a U-turn on conceding that its jab may induce TTS.
Lawyers representing victims and families are suing AstraZeneca under the Consumer Protection Act of 1987.
They claim the vaccination was ‘a faulty product’ that was ‘not as safe as customers generally were reasonably entitled to expect’.AstraZeneca has categorically disputed these assertions.
In March 2021, just over two months after its initial deployment in the UK, health officials found cases of VITT connected to AstraZeneca’s vaccine in Europe.
However, the evidence did not become clear enough to limit the jab until April of that year.
Initially, officials confined the jab to adults over 30. In May 2021, it will be limited to individuals over 40.
Because the vaccination still functioned against COVID-19, it was thought worthwhile to administer it to elderly British citizens who were more likely to die or be injured if they became ill with the virus.
Approximately 50 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine were administered in the United Kingdom.
The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency reports that at least 81 Brits have died from blood clot issues associated with the AstraZeneca jab.
An unconfirmed number of people have been hurt or incapacitated.
Covid vaccine rollouts have reduced or eliminated the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine in favor of mRNA alternatives from Pfizer and Moderna.
With health officials not ordering more doses, the jab has effectively been removed in the UK.
The risk of TTS following AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccination is around one in 50,000.
However, AstraZeneca’s jab is credited with saving around 6 million lives worldwide during the Covid epidemic.
MailOnline met with victims and families seeking compensation, who strongly support vaccination for public health and do not oppose it.
The motives for legal action are complex.
Some seriously disabled people are facing significant continuous medical bills as well as being out of work. In certain circumstances, their family members must also abandon their jobs to provide them with round-the-clock care.
Health
Report Causes Pfizer Stock to Climb Approximately $1 Billion Acquired by Starboard
(VOR News) – According to a rumor that activist investor Pfizer Starboard Value has taken a holding in the struggling pharmaceutical business that is expected to be worth around one billion dollars, the stock of Pfizer (PFE) is on the increase in premarket trading on Monday.
This comes after the report was made public. The report was made available to the general public following this. Starboard Value was successful in moving forward with the acquisition of the position.
Starboard is said to have approached Ian Read, a former chief executive officer of Pfizer, and Frank D’Amelio, a former chief financial officer, in order to seek assistance with its goals of boosting the performance of the company, according to the Wall Street Journal. Read and D’Amelio are both former Pfizer executives.
The purpose of this is to facilitate the accomplishment of its objectives, which include enhancing the overall performance of the firm.
In their previous jobs, D’Amelio and Read were chief financial officers.
It is stated in the report that the hedge fund is of the opinion that Pfizer, which is currently being managed by Albert Bourla, who succeeded Read as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in 2019, does not demonstrate the same level of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) discipline that Read did. Bourla took over for Read in 2019. Read was succeeded by Bourla in the year 2019.
Pfizer, a multinational pharmaceutical conglomerate, has made substantial investments in the acquisition of more companies that are involved in the research and development of cancer medicines.
These businesses have been acquired for billions of dollars. The biotechnology company Seagen, which was acquired by Pfizer in the previous year for a price of $43 billion, is included in this category. One of the businesses that can be classified as belonging to this category is Seagen.
In spite of the fact that the S&P 500 Index experienced a 21% increase in 2024.
No major trading occurred in Pfizer stock that year.
Due to the fact that the demand for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines fell after the firm reached its pandemic peak in 2021, the share price of the corporation has decreased by over fifty percent since that time.
This drop has occurred ever since the company’s shares reached their maximum peak, which was during the time that this decline occurred. Not only have they not changed at all, but they have also remained essentially stable. This is in contrast to the S&P 500, which has gained 21% since the beginning of this year.
Recently, the corporation was forced to take a hit when it decided to recall all of the sickle cell illness medications that it had distributed all over the world.
Fears that the prescription could lead patients to experience severe agony and possibly even death were the impetus for the decision to recall the product. In spite of the fact that Pfizer’s stock is increasing by almost three percent as a result of the news that followed the company’s decision, this is the circumstance that has come about.
SOURCE: IPN
SEE ALSO:
New Study Reveals Drinking Soda Pop Increases the Risk of Stroke
The Mpox Vaccine’s Protection Decreases Within a Year; Booster Requirements
Health
New Study Reveals Drinking Soda Pop Increases the Risk of Stroke
A recent report from global research indicates that excessive consumption of coffee or soda pop is associated with an increased risk of stroke, although the intake of black and green tea is correlated with a reduced risk. Excessive consumption of soda pop or coffee warrants caution!
Recent research indicates that it may substantially elevate the risk of stroke.
Consuming four cups of coffee daily elevates the risk of stroke, according to studies, although ingesting 3-4 cups of black or green tea daily typically offers protection against stroke. Additionally, consume more coffee; it may reduce your risk of mortality.
Recent findings from global research studies co-led by the University of Galway and McMaster University, alongside an international consortium of stroke researchers, indicate that soda, encompassing both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened variants such as diet or zero sugar, is associated with a 22 percent heightened risk of stroke. The risk escalated significantly with the consumption of two or more of these beverages daily.
Stroke Risk Fizzy Drinks and Soda Pop
The correlation between fizzy drinks consumption and stroke risk was most pronounced in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South America. Women exhibit the most elevated risk of stroke from bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage) associated with fruit juice beverages. Consuming over 7 cups of water daily diminishes the likelihood of stroke due to a clot.
Researchers observed that numerous items advertised as fruit juice are derived from concentrates and have added sugars and preservatives, potentially negating the advantages often associated with fresh fruit and instead elevating stroke risk.
Fruit juice beverages were associated with a 37 percent heightened risk of stroke resulting from bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage). Consuming two of these beverages daily increases the risk thrice.
Consuming over four cups of coffee daily elevates the risk of stroke by 37 percent, although lower consumption levels do not correlate with stroke risk. Conversely, tea consumption was associated with an 18-20 percent reduction in stroke risk. Additionally, consuming 3-4 cups daily of black tea, such as Breakfast and Earl Grey varieties, excluding green and herbal teas, was associated with a 29 percent reduced risk of stroke.
Consuming 3-4 cups of green tea daily was associated with a 27 percent reduction in stroke risk. Notably, the addition of milk may diminish or inhibit the advantageous effects of antioxidants present in tea. The lower risk of stroke associated with tea consumption was negated for individuals who added milk.
Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational reasons and should not be considered a replacement for professional medical counsel. Consistently consult your physician regarding any inquiries pertaining to a medical problem.
Related News:
Starbucks Faces Sales Decline Amid Price Fatigue and Rising Competition
Starbucks Faces Sales Decline Amid Price Fatigue and Rising Competition
Health
Following a Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, What Else Should You Know?
(VOR News) – Even though breast cancer affects one in eight American women, receiving a diagnosis can make a woman feel isolated.
Experts in breast cancer from the American College of Physicians (ACS) advise patients on how to manage their disease so that they may better cope with this awful information.
First, the kind and stage of breast cancer dictates the course of your care.
In addition to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, there are various surgical options available for the treatment of breast cancer.
Women of African descent are disproportionately affected by triple-negative breast cancer, an extremely aggressive form of the disease that has never proven easy to treat.
According to the American Cancer Society, pembrolizumab (Keytruda), an immunotherapy, has been shown to be helpful when combined with chemotherapy and is currently the recommended course of treatment for certain combinations of triple-negative breast cancer.
In her presentation, Dr. Katharine Yao said, “It’s really important that the patient and physician discuss the patient’s preferences and values when deciding what type of treatment to pursue and that they have an honest, individualized discussion with their care team.”
She is currently responsible for developing breast cancer treatment recommendations for more than 575 hospitals and institutions nationwide in her role as chair of the American College of Surgeons’ National Accreditation Program for Breast Institutions (NAPBC).
Yao, vice chair of research at Endeavor Health NorthShore Hospitals in New York, pointed out that each decision made about a patient’s treatment plan should take her preferences and diagnosis into consideration.
She ought to think about whether she would prefer a mastectomy—a surgical procedure that involves removing the entire breast with or without reconstruction—or a lumpectomy, which involves a surgical procedure that spares part of the breast tissue.
She stated that “the breast cancer you have may be very different from the breast cancer you hear about in your neighbor, colleague, or friend” in a press release issued by the American Cancer Society (ACS).
“Consider that while discussing breast cancer with others.”
Throughout your journey, it is critical that you look after your emotional health because having breast cancer may have a detrimental impact on your mental health.
“Getting a cancer diagnosis does not mean that everything in your life stops to be normal.” Director of the Fellowship in the Diseases of the Breast program at the Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute at the University of Arkansas and state head of the American Cancer Society Commission on Cancer for Arkansas, Dr. Daniela Ochoa She thinks adding the burden of a cancer diagnosis and treatment to all the other pressures in life may be taxing.
“Managing stress and emotional health is vital component of a treatment plan.”
Ochoa recommends clinically trained psychologists and social workers who have assisted people in coping with cancer to anyone receiving treatment. Learning coping techniques might also be facilitated by joining cancer support groups or cancer wellness initiatives.
Breast cancer specialists say your care team is crucial.
The American Cancer Society (ACS) defines comprehensive care as having support at every stage of the procedure from surgeons, oncologists, patient navigators, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and other specialists.
After receiving a breast cancer diagnosis, women should see a surgeon or medical oncologist to explore their options; nevertheless, treatment shouldn’t be discontinued after just one appointment or after surgery is over.
Additionally, you can ask trustworthy friends or family members to accompany you to appointments and aid you with research or notes. They could serve as a network of support for you.
Yao stated in his talk that “one of the most important things is that patients should search out a team they have confidence in, that they trust will have their back when they need it, and a team they feel they can get access to and that will help them when they are in need.”
SOURCE: MP
SEE ALSO:
The Mpox Vaccine’s Protection Decreases Within a Year; Booster Requirements
COVID was a Paradigm Shift in Health Policymaking, Says Commissioner Stella Kyriakides.
Rwanda Reports 8 Deaths Linked To Ebola-Like Marburg Virus Days After It Declared An Outbreak
-
News3 years ago
Let’s Know About Ultra High Net Worth Individual
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Mabelle Prior: The Voice of Hope, Resilience, and Diversity Inspiring Generations
-
Health3 years ago
How Much Ivermectin Should You Take?
-
Tech2 years ago
Top Forex Brokers of 2023: Reviews and Analysis for Successful Trading
-
Lifestyles2 years ago
Aries Soulmate Signs
-
Movies2 years ago
What Should I Do If Disney Plus Keeps Logging Me Out of TV?
-
Health3 years ago
Can I Buy Ivermectin Without A Prescription in the USA?
-
Learning2 years ago
Virtual Numbers: What Are They For?