Entertainment

How the Glow of Celeb Fame is Helping NFTs Shine Brighter

Celebrities aren’t always at the forefront of new tech innovations, but they seem to be dashing to become part of NFTs. Their glamor and fame are helping keep NFTs in the spotlight of public consciousness, to the extent that NFTs and NFT stocks are probably strong enough to endure even without any celebrity buzz.

NFTs offer celebrity artists a new revenue channel

NFT stands for non-fungible tokens, which are tokens that are based on blockchain and used to authenticate and prove ownership over digital assets. Almost any type of digital item can be minted into an NFT, including digital art, music tracks, avatars, memes, fashion items, and more.

One of the many benefits of NFTs is that because they perfectly track every trade, artists can use them to continue receiving royalties on their work, which means they enjoy revenue from secondary sales which would otherwise go solely to the middleman. Not surprisingly, even celebrity artists like the idea of keeping more of the profits from their own creative work. Banksy has sold artwork as an NFT, and so did Damien Hirst, digital artist Beeple, and other well-known artists.

Musicians who’ve embraced NFTs include synth-pop singer Grimes, Shakira, Lewis Capaldi, Steve Aoki, Soulja Boy, and Aphex Twin. Shawn Mendes made NFT wearables of his guitar, vest, necklace, and earrings; Jay-Z, Kings of Leon, Doja Cat, and Eminem all sold albums as NFTs, and Katy Perry launched her NFT line in December 2021.

Filmmakers, for their part, discovered that NFTs can secure film scenes and stills, uncut material, and outtakes as well as memes and digital art, making it possible to sell those too. If you want to watch Mila Kunis’ new animated show, Stoner Cats, you’ll need to buy one of the 10,420 NFTs. Quentin Tarantino is battling Miramax for the right to sell uncut scenes from Pulp Fiction as NFTs, and Justin Roiland, creator of Rick and Morty, has an NFT collection for sale.

NFTs and celebrities are a match made in showbiz heaven

Another effect of NFTs is that they enable a more direct relationship between artists and their fans. Musicians found that NFTs and the metaverse offered a way to continue to perform and connect with fans during the pandemic. Travis Scott and The Weeknd already held metaverse concerts, and in case you thought this was just a lockdown phenomenon, ABBA and Ariana Grande both have metaverse concerts planned for next year.

Sports stars quickly learned that fans will fall over themselves to buy NFTs of their greatest athletic achievements. It probably started with NBA’s Top Shots, which turned moments of basketball history into NFTs. By now, we have NFTs commemorating NFL player Rob Gronkowski’s Super Bowl wins; NFT art depicting heavyweight champion Tyson Fury; a set of 4 NFT artworks of footballer Lionel Messi called, appropriately, The Messiverse; and an NFT of skateboarder icon Tony Hawk carrying out his signature move, a 540-degree Ollie, for what he declares is the last time.

The sports-NFT connection is so deep that NFL quarterback Tom Brady co-founded his own sports-focused NFT platform, called Autograph, which Usain Bolt, Naomi Osaka, and Tiger Words have all used to sell signed NFT trading cards. Simone Biles went one step further and sold animated scenes of her most famous and iconic gymnastics moves through Autograph.

Celebrity trades help publicize the NFT market

Celebrities aren’t just minting NFTs to sell to their fans. They’re also putting their money where their mouths are and investing in NFTs themselves, moving NFTs from a nerdy side-show to being part of popular culture.

For example, many people invested in Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs after celebrities like Jimmy Fallon, DJ Khaled, and Post Malone publicized their purchases and made Bored Apes into a status symbol. In fact, Jimmy Fallon’s announcement about his Bored Ape was probably the first time many had heard of NFTs.

Celebrity investment puts NFTs into the headlines, normalizing the concept in a broader way. Buying and selling digital assets is still pretty new, so the more people read about NFT trades, the more likely they are to feel confident enough to buy in themselves.

It helps that an incredibly broad range of celebrities have either bought into or minted their own NFTs. Snoop Dogg was a very early investor in NFTs, creating a portfolio worth over $17 million under the pseudonym Cozomo de Medici. Top fashion brands Burberry and Dolce & Gabbana made NFT-based digital fashion collections. Entrepreneur Gary Vaynerchuck launched an NFT project called VeeFriends; tennis star Serena Williams has an impressive NFT portfolio; and Martha Stewart has already sold not one, but two series of NFTs.

NFTs aren’t relying on famous names for success

While celebrities helped raise public awareness about NFTs, people don’t (and shouldn’t) choose to invest in an NFT just because a celebrity is involved. There’ve been enough celebrity NFTs that have lost value after their initial drop to prove that being famous isn’t enough to guarantee that your NFT will soar.

At the end of a year of massive NFT activity, it’s arguable that NFTs don’t need help from the stars any more. Although NFT prices have fluctuated, just like those of every investment, there’s no sign that this is a bubble waiting to burst.

Investors who want to be part of the NFT excitement, but don’t want the risk or responsibility of hunting for an NFT that’s likely to increase in value, have been looking for NFT stocks to buy instead. Top NFT stocks can be companies that create NFT content, but there are also blockchain companies, cryptocurrencies, and NFT infrastructure stocks on any best NFT stocks list and in NFT ETFs, which are another option for would-be NFT investors to join celebrities in this disruptive sector.

Important Disclosures:

Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. As an ETF, the fund may trade at a premium or discount to NAV. Shares of any ETF are bought and sold at market price (not NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the Fund. The Fund is not actively managed and would not sell a security due to current or projected under performance unless that security is removed from the Index or is required upon a reconstitution of the Index.

The Index, and consequently the Fund, is expected to concentrate its investments (i.e., hold more than 25% of its total assets) in the securities of Crypto and Blockchain Companies. As a result, the value of the Fund’s shares may rise and fall more than the value of shares of a fund that invests in securities of companies in a broader range of industries.

The mechanics of using blockchain technology to transact in digital or other types of assets, such as securities or derivatives, is relatively new and untested. There is no assurance that widespread adoption will occur. A lack of expansion in the usage of blockchain technology could adversely affect Crypto and Blockchain Companies. Transacting on a blockchain depends in part specifically on the use of cryptographic keys that are required to access a user’s account (or “wallet”). The theft, loss, or destruction of these keys could adversely affect a user’s ownership claims over an asset or a company’s business or operations if it was dependent on the blockchain.

The Fund is considered to be non-diversified, which means that it may invest more of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it were a diversified fund. As a result, the Fund may be more exposed to the risks associated with and developments affecting an individual issuer or a smaller number of issuers than a fund that invests more widely. This may increase the Fund’s volatility and cause the performance of a relatively smaller number of issuers to have a greater impact on the Fund’s performance.

Investments in non-U.S. securities involve certain risks that may not be present with investments in U.S. securities. For example, investments in non-U.S. securities may be subject to risk of loss due to foreign currency fluctuations or to political or economic instability. There may be less information publicly available about a non-U.S. issuer than a U.S. issuer.

The BITA Next Gen NFT Index is a rules-based index that consists of the common stock (or depositary receipts) of companies that are building a platform or developing technology to use, or have at least one use or test case for using, NFT (Non-Fungible Token), cryptocurrency trading platforms, cryptocurrency mining, cryptocurrency banking or related services, or blockchain-related technology, as well as companies that have announced publicly that they intend to enter such space or have begun working on such products (collectively, “Crypto and Blockchain Companies”). The Index consists of companies listed on North American and European exchanges and aims to capture the potential upside generated by earnings related to the adoption of crypto- and blockchain-related technologies, including NFTs and cryptocurrency.

Neither the Fund nor its relative Index will invest directly in NFTs or any funds investing in NFTs. The Index, and as a result the Fund, are currently limited to investments in companies with exposure to the NFT ecosystem. As a result, the Fund’s price movement will not track individual or collections of NFTs. Since NFTs are an emerging technology, the Index is currently expected to consist of companies whose activities in the NFT ecosystem comprise a smaller portion of their revenues, profits, or investments relative to other activities or industries in which they engage. There can be no guarantee that a company’s activities in the NFT ecosystem will become significant for the company or that its economic fortunes will be tied to such activities in the future.

NFTZ is new with a limited operating history.

Go to defianceetfs.com/nftz to read more about NFT including current performance and holdings information. Fund holdings are subject to change and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any securities.

The Defiance ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC.

The Funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. Please read carefully before investing. A hard copy of the prospectuses can be requested by calling 833.333.9383 or at defianceetfs.com.

Also Check:

How E-bikes Help to Boost Fitness and Why It is Necessary for You

How the Glow of Celeb Fame is Helping NFTs Shine Brighter

Why Cybersecurity Careers are the Fastest Growing in IT

Three Reasons why you should consider an Electric Van

Entertainment

Reports of a Split Contract Point to Taylor Swift and Her Fiancé Travis Kelce’s Matching.

(VOR News) – One of the ways that Taylor Swift showed her support for her boyfriend was by going to a football game that Travis Kelce was playing in while wearing a magnificent plaid suit that matched the outfit that he was wearing.

When this was done, it was done with the aim of making it happen, despite the fact that there were rumors going around about a split contract between the two of them.

The guy, who was 34 years old at the time, made a stunning entrance at Arrowhead Stadium while wearing a magnificent gray and black Taylor Swift checkered suit that was designed by Vivienne Westwood, who was also the designer of the costume.

She donned Taylor Swift clothing to show her support for Travis and the Chiefs.

Furthermore, they had arrived at the stadium earlier that day wearing Taylor Swift’s plaid shirt and jeans that were extremely similar to Kelce’s, which served as the basis for their synchronized costumes. This foundation was the foundation for their coordinated costumes. When Kelce arrived at the stadium, he was still wearing the same shirt and jeans that he had worn earlier.

Furthermore, Taylor greeted the occasion with a good attitude by matching her dress with a magnificent purse in the shape of a heart that she held on her wrist. This was yet another way that she showed her appreciation for the event. This item was a component of her ensemble.

It was stated by the Daily Mail that she made her return with this appearance, despite the fact that she had been absent from the two Chiefs games that came before it owing to her obligations to the Eras Tour. The fact that she had not been present for either of those games did not prevent her from accomplishing this.

“Now you all can shut the heck up about that bulls**t ‘breakup contract,'” a fan wrote on X in connection to this matter to express their opinion on the matter. “Now you can stop talking about anything.” “Now y’all can stop the hell up about that…”

It was a different fan who was the one who broke the news at this time period.

The statement reads, “BREAKING: Travis Kelce has reached a long-term extension with Taylor Swift.”

Following an extensive amount of deliberation and debate, the two parties have reached consensus on a deal that will be in place for the subsequent three years.

Providing that Travis continues to be advantageous for Taylor Swift’s company, the rules of the agreement indicate that Taylor Swift has the authority to renew the deal in the event that Travis continues to be useful. In the event that Travis is the one who is accountable for doing the dishes, there is a possibility that he may be awarded a bonus of some kind.

Swift and Kelce’s followers were able to let out a sigh of relief when it was discovered that a “contract” that had been reported to have been leaked and disclosed the exact date of Swift and Kelce’s separation was found to be nothing more than a fabrication.

This information was obtained from the source. It had been anticipated that the “contract” would have been made available.

In addition, it is worth noting that when the publication that stated that the couple had made the decision to end their relationship a month ago began to circulate on the internet, representatives for Travis were obligated to reject the charges.

SOURCE: GN

Entertainment

‘Joker 2’ Tops the International Box Office with $81.1 Million.

(VOR News) – It is projected that “Joker: Folie à Deux” made its debut this weekend with an estimated total of $81.1 million.

This would make it the most successful film at the box office around the world and the most profitable film overall from a financial standpoint. The picture, which is a sequel to the 2019 blockbuster smash “Joker,” only made $40 million in the United States of America, which is a pitiful amount of money.

The film is a sequel to the 2019 mega hit. In the year 2019, the trailer for the movie was made available. The cinematic adaptation of the peculiar comic book has generated an astonishing sum of $121.1 million in revenue all over the world. This is a result of the film’s success.

Considering that the production of “Joker: Folie à Deux” took place at an incredible cost of two hundred million dollars, Warner Bros., the corporation that provided the finance for the picture, is currently confronted with a dilemma as a result of this fact.

The second “Joker” cost $65 million, compared to $75 million for the original.

This is a substantial difference in terms of the budget. The movie has been given a terrible “D” CinemaScore since the majority of the reviews that have been published about the film have been unfavorable, and audiences appear to agree with the reviewers. As a result of this, the movie has been given a terrible “D” CinemaScore.

Lady Gaga, who is responsible for putting her own distinctive twist on Harley Quinn, a favorite character from the comics, is responsible for a significant portion of the additional expense.

Phillips, Joaquin Phoenix, who reprises his role as the unstable comedian Arthur Fleck, and Lady Gaga are all responsible for a significant portion of the increased budget. There is a large portion of the additional costs that are linked with the production of the picture that may be attributed to these payments.

There were a total of 25,788 theaters and 76 markets outside of the United States that showed the movie. In order to act as screening locations, these locations were selected.

The fact that “Joker: Folie à Deux” made $8 million in the United Kingdom, $6.9 million in Germany, $5.6 million in Italy, $5.5 million in Mexico, and $5 million in France is a fascinating piece of information to take into consideration. Furthermore, the film made $5 million in France.

Only a few examples of what has been accomplished are presented here, but they are representative of the many different results that have been obtained. One week after the film will be released in Japan on the same day, it will make its debut in China on October 16th. This will be one week after the film is released in Japan.

Japan will also release the Joker movie to the public on that same day.

After grossing $335 million in the United States, the first “Joker” film grossed $743 million in other nations across the world. This is despite the fact that the film was only released in the United States.

In addition to generating a large amount of revenue, the movie was a smash hit that was incredibly well received by audiences. The film “Deadpool & Wolverine” broke the record for the highest-grossing R-rated film when it grossed $1.32 billion worldwide.

This achievement was accomplished by the film. The film was successful in accomplishing this specific goal. During a particular period of time, the film was the one that achieved the distinction of being the highest-grossing R-rated film movie.

Before “Joker 2” caused a breach between audiences and critics, Phillips announced that he had ended his career as a director of films based on comic books. At the end of the day, “Joker 2” was not successful. By the time this took place, the film had not yet been responsible for causing the rift.

“It was fun to play in this sort of sandbox for two movies, but I think we’ve said what we wanted to say in this world,” he said in an interview with Variety in the month of August. “It was a lot of fun.” “It was a lot of fun.” “It was a lot of fun.”

SOURCE: VN

Entertainment

Reviews of Silent Hill 2 Provide a Higher-Than-Expected Metacritical Score.

(VOR News) – The Bloober Team and Konami-produced remake of the horror game Silent Hill 2 is scheduled to launch the following week, but reviews have already started to surface, giving players a sneak peek at the updated version of the game before it is made available to the public.

It would be an understatement to say that Bloober Team was under a great deal of pressure to get the game right, especially considering that the survival-horror genre’s enthusiasts regard Silent Hill almost as highly as Resident Evil.

Considering the Metacritic score that the game has received thus far, Silent Hill 2 players shouldn’t have any worries when the game launches on November 8

. This is due to the score, which shows that the game has only ever earned favorable reviews up to this point. Fans of the Bloober Team and Silent Hill will be happy to hear this news.

Silent Hill 2 currently has an 87 Metacritic rating.

In 50 reviews, the PlayStation 5 version received a score of 87, meaning that it also received an 87 on that platform. This is based on the fact that the score was given to the PlayStation 5 version. The Silent Hill 2 personal computer version received an overall rating of 88 out of 5, placing it somewhat higher than the PlayStation 5 version.

There isn’t an Xbox version of Silent Hill 2 that can be regarded as existing because it wasn’t part of the Xbox Series X|S. There isn’t any information available at this time on whether or not it will ever be made accessible on that specific platform.

A considerable portion of Silent Hill fans had not in the slightest expected that Silent Hill 2 would achieve five flawless scores of one hundred before these reviews were published. It is extremely unlikely that they expected anything at all. Actually, the great majority of reviews are favorable.

They also call it a welcome return to form for the Silent Hill brand, complimenting the Bloober Team for their appreciation for the first Silent Hill 2. Furthermore, they believe it to be the ideal starting point for beginners who have never really experienced Silent Hill before.

Due of this, Silent Hill 2 has few Metacritic reviews, both positive and negative.

No bad reviews have been posted. Some people think that the remake may have retained some of the most annoying and constrictive elements of the original Silent Hill 2 by staying too close to the original. These individuals believe that there might have been some issues brought on by the remake.

Thankfully for those of us who are now playing Silent Hill 2, those reviews are the exception rather than the rule, with the vast majority of positive reviews making up the small amount of negative reviews.

It is true that some people became skeptical about the remake because the Bloober Team was in charge of it. Furthermore, in the perspective of both its own series and the genre at large, Silent Hill 2 has been held in the highest regard ever since it was first made accessible to the general public.

Games like Layers of Fear, The Medium, and the Blair Witch game were all made by the Bloober Team; nevertheless, no matter which game was reviewed, none of these titles received particularly high review scores. With the release of Silent Hill 2, it’s possible that the public’s perception of the Bloober Team may undergo a significant shift.

Additionally, we are now writing our own review of Silent Hill 2.

Although it has taken longer than expected because we acquired our review copy after the game was already in progress.

However, even though more reviews are being received, it is highly doubtful that these would significantly lower Silent Hill 2’s Metacritic score. despite the fact that more reviews are coming in. Players of Silent Hill 2 should have a lot to look forward to in the upcoming week as a result of this.

SOURCE: CB