Washington — Trump Media,  The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will not hear an appeal from social media platform X about a search warrant acquired by prosecutors in the election meddling case against former President Donald Trump.

The justices did not explain their rationale, and there were no recorded dissents.

The firm, which was known as Twitter before being purchased by billionaire Elon Musk, claims a nondisclosure order that prevented it from informing Trump about the warrant obtained by special counsel Jack Smith’s team violated its First Amendment rights.

The business also claims Trump should have had an opportunity to exercise executive privilege. If not reined in, the government may employ similar tactics to intercept additional privileged communications, their lawyers contended.

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

Two neutral electronic privacy groups also joined in, urging the high court to hear the case on First Amendment grounds.

Prosecutors, however, claim that the corporation never shown that Trump utilized the account for official purposes, therefore executive privilege is not a problem. A lower court also determined that informing Trump could have compromised the current probe.

Trump utilized his Twitter account in the weeks preceding up to his supporters’ attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, to spread false assertions about the election, which prosecutors claim were intended to create doubt in the democratic process.

The indictment describes how Trump used his Twitter account to encourage his followers to travel to Washington on Jan. 6, pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to reject the certification, and falsely claiming that the Capitol crowd, which battered police officers and destroyed glass, was peaceful.

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

That case is now moving forward following the Supreme Court’s verdict in July, which granted Trump full immunity from criminal prosecution as a former president.

The warrant arrived at Twitter amid quick changes implemented by Musk, who bought the company in 2022 and has since cut off most of its workforce, including those dedicated to combating disinformation and hate speech.

He also welcomed back a vast list of previously banned users, including Trump, and endorsed him for the 2024 presidential election.

SOURCE | AP

(VOR News) – Dr. Allan Lichtman, a notable presidential historian, has reiterated his forecast that Vice President Kamala Harris will emerge victorious in the presidential election of 2024, which will be contested against former President Donald Trump.

The election will take place in the United States of America. Specifically, the United States of America will serve as the location of the election. Concerns that a “October surprise” would have an impact on the outcome of the election have also been dispelled by him to the extent that he has been successful.

His prediction was made at the beginning of Kamala Harris September by Dr. Lichtman, a professor at American University who is well-known for accurately predicting nine out of the last ten elections that have taken place in the United States.

Kamala Harris is famous for reliably predicting election results.

“The October surprise is one of the greatest myths in American politics,” Dr. Lichtman said in a CNN interview with Michael Smerconish. This is what Dr. Lichtman said during the discussion. I have never revised my prediction in any way in response to an October surprise.

This is because the keys assess the overall strength of the government that is currently in power rather than being impacted by the events that will transpire during the campaign.

A group of thirteen characteristics that Dr. Lichtman employs in order to assess the viability of each contender for the presidency is referred to as the “keys,” and the term “keys” is used to refer to the characteristics that are being evaluated.

As a result of the allegations that he made in September, it appears that Kamala Harris is in a stronger position to gain eight of the thirteen keys, whereas Trump has only been able to get three of them.

The assertion that Dr. Lichtman made regarding the insignificance of “October surprises” is supported by precedents that have been formed throughout the course of history.

Such precedents have been established. According to a video that was taken from the television show “Access Hollywood” in the time leading up to the election in 2016, it was revealed that President Trump had made things that were not proper from a female perspective. Over the course of the weeks leading up to the election, the recording was accomplished.

In spite of the ramifications that led to Trump’s defeat, Lichtman predicted, based on his primary system, that Trump would ultimately emerge victorious in the election. This forecast was based on the assumption that Trump would emerge victorious in the election.

Over the course of his forty years of experience, Lichtman has never altered a prediction, and he does not intend to do so at this time.

Lightman won’t change Kamala Harris’ prediction.

According to the scholar, who identifies himself as a registered Democrat, he has properly predicted the outcome of each and every presidential election that has taken place since 1984. He claims that he has done this for every single election. It has been his experience that he has done this for each and every election.

On the other hand, there are members of the skeptical community who point out inconsistencies in his reasoning over the course of his career, particularly in relation to the elections that took place in the years 2000 and 2016.

Furthermore, Dr. Lichtman emphasized the need for voter involvement, despite the fact that he did not deviate from his unshakable prediction of Kamala Harris outcome regarding the election. The crowd was given his counsel, which was as follows: “The outcome is up to you, so get out there and vote,” he said.

Kamala Harris has a two-percentage point advantage in multi-candidate surveys, according to the most current Real Clear Politics aggregate, which displays the results of the survey.

This is in line with the findings of current polling data, which indicate that Mrs. Harris is at a tiny advantage over Donald Trump in the race for the presidency.

SOUREC: NDTV

SEE ALSO:

Scientists Awarded MicroRNA The Nobel Prize in Medicine.

US Inflation will Comfort a Fed Focused on Labor Markets.

PITTSBURGH — As she pushed back against Republican contender Donald Trump’s charges that she’s advocating “communist” ideals, Vice President Kamala Harris committed on Wednesday to develop an economy that is both pro-business and aids the middle class.

The Democratic nominee stated in remarks at the Economic Club of Pittsburgh in battleground Pennsylvania that she “would take good ideas from wherever they come” as she promised to double the number of people taught in registered apprenticeships and underlined her support for increased home ownership.

“As president, I will be grounded in my fundamental values of fairness, dignity and opportunity,” Harris told the crowd. “And I promise you, I will be pragmatic in my approach.”

Harris Is Making A ‘Capitalist’ Pitch To Boost The Economy As Trump Pushes Deeper Into Populism

A little more than an hour before her address, Trump visited a furnituremaker in Mint Hill, North Carolina, and presented his own competing economic agenda. He defended his proposal for a special lower tax rate for American manufacturers and promised to apply tariffs high enough to result in an “exodus” of auto production employment from Japan, Germany, and South Korea.

“I’m imposing tariffs on your competition from foreign countries, all these foreign countries that have ripped us off, which stole all of your businesses and all of your jobs years ago,” Mr. Trump added.

The two candidates’ dueling remarks demonstrated how they’re polishing their economic messaging for voters in battleground states. Both are attempting to deflect criticism while presenting their best cases to a public nonetheless concerned about the economy’s health. Trump is focused on U.S. dominance over international competitors, whereas Harris emphasizes the significance of assisting the middle class and entrepreneurs.

Harris later spoke with MSNBC and responded to Trump’s request for tariffs, stating, “You don’t just throw around the idea of, just tariffs across the board.” She said of her opponent, “He’s just not serious about very many of these issues.”

In the interview, the vice president also reiterated her desire for higher corporate tax rates, stating, “I’m not mad at anyone for succeeding, but everyone should pay their fair share.”

Those statements came after Harris’ address, which focused on her overall worldview and what she hopes to achieve for the economy. That contrasted with Trump’s, which was more freestyle, including insinuations about an Iranian connection to the two assassination attempts on him.

If elected, the former president promised to reduce the corporation tax rate from 21% to 15% for domestically produced goods. The Republican nominee said that his support for wide tariffs as high as 20% had made him an international target.

“This is why people in countries want to kill me,” he told me. “They’re not happy with me.”

The candidates are each emphasizing the economy at a time when surveys show it to be one of the most important concerns for voters to consider when deciding who to vote for. According to a recent AP-NORC poll, neither candidate has a clear advantage in public opinion on this topic.

Both claim that their respective approaches will do more to ensure that the United States economy, not China’s, dominates the globe in this century. Both are eager to project an image of a tax cutter and accuse the other of supporting enormous tax increases on the middle class. It’s a significant shift in message, as inflation concerns have subsided after the Federal Reserve dropped its benchmark interest rate last week.

Harris rebutted Trump by stating that she is a capitalist who supports a “active partnership between government and the private sector.” It was said that Trump has “no intention to grow our middle class — he’s only interested in making life better for himself and people like himself.”

The Democratic contender intends to provide $100 billion in tax credits and other incentives to boost US manufacturing and emerging technologies, according to a source familiar with her ideas who spoke on the condition of anonymity. She plans to release a pamphlet outlining her economic vision.

In other news, billionaire Mark Cuban stated that he and other business executives support Harris because she has taken thoughtful positions that firms can understand, even if they disagree.

“I want a president who, for business, goes into detail and has a policy team that understands all of the ramifications of what’s been proposed,” Cuban said on a Harris campaign-organized press call Tuesday.

The Harris campaign’s efforts to demonstrate business support have coincided with Trump’s in proposing a slew of populist proposals. In addition to eliminating taxes on tips, Social Security, and overtime pay, Trump wants to limit credit card interest rates to 10% and create low-tax zones on federal lands to attract employers. Trump also wants to repeal the cap on state and local tax deductions, which he enacted into law while president in 2017.

Both candidates perceive an opportunity to criticize each other’s tax proposals. Trump recently called Harris the “tax queen.” She proposes raising the corporation tax rate from 21% to 28%, as well as taxing unrealized capital gains for those worth more than $100 million. She would use the proceeds from that and other programs to extend tax cuts for the middle class that are slated to expire after 2025, as well as to provide new tax benefits to parents and entrepreneurs. Many of her programs are based on concepts originally offered by President Joe Biden.

Trump says that her proposed tax increases will eventually benefit the middle class.

“She’s coming for your money,” he warned a crowd on Monday. “She’s coming for your pensions, and she’s coming for your savings.”

Harris demonstrated that two can play the game. She dubbed his tariff proposal a “national sales tax,” claiming that it would raise the cost of coffee, clothing, electronics, automobiles, and practically anything else that is imported or relies on imported parts.

Her campaign frequently cites an analysis by Brendan Duke of the Center for American Progress, which found that a 20% universal tariff would cost the average household about $4,000 per year. According to calculations based on Treasury Department data, that amount would essentially increase middle-income earners’ overall federal taxes by 50%.

Trump has long portrayed himself as someone who will reduce restrictions, but Harris stated Wednesday that she would do the same because “whether it’s a new housing development, a new factory, or a new bridge, projects take too long to go from concept to reality.”

“China is not moving slowly,” Harris explained. She also stated that she would reform permitting and reduce red tape since “patience may be a virtue, but not when it comes to job creation or America’s competitiveness.”

SOURCE | AP