Washington — Trump Media,  The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will not hear an appeal from social media platform X about a search warrant acquired by prosecutors in the election meddling case against former President Donald Trump.

The justices did not explain their rationale, and there were no recorded dissents.

The firm, which was known as Twitter before being purchased by billionaire Elon Musk, claims a nondisclosure order that prevented it from informing Trump about the warrant obtained by special counsel Jack Smith’s team violated its First Amendment rights.

The business also claims Trump should have had an opportunity to exercise executive privilege. If not reined in, the government may employ similar tactics to intercept additional privileged communications, their lawyers contended.

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

Two neutral electronic privacy groups also joined in, urging the high court to hear the case on First Amendment grounds.

Prosecutors, however, claim that the corporation never shown that Trump utilized the account for official purposes, therefore executive privilege is not a problem. A lower court also determined that informing Trump could have compromised the current probe.

Trump utilized his Twitter account in the weeks preceding up to his supporters’ attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, to spread false assertions about the election, which prosecutors claim were intended to create doubt in the democratic process.

The indictment describes how Trump used his Twitter account to encourage his followers to travel to Washington on Jan. 6, pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to reject the certification, and falsely claiming that the Capitol crowd, which battered police officers and destroyed glass, was peaceful.

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Appeal From Elon Musk’s X Platform Over Warrant In Trump Case

That case is now moving forward following the Supreme Court’s verdict in July, which granted Trump full immunity from criminal prosecution as a former president.

The warrant arrived at Twitter amid quick changes implemented by Musk, who bought the company in 2022 and has since cut off most of its workforce, including those dedicated to combating disinformation and hate speech.

He also welcomed back a vast list of previously banned users, including Trump, and endorsed him for the 2024 presidential election.

SOURCE | AP

(VOR News) – Dr. Allan Lichtman, a notable presidential historian, has reiterated his forecast that Vice President Kamala Harris will emerge victorious in the presidential election of 2024, which will be contested against former President Donald Trump.

The election will take place in the United States of America. Specifically, the United States of America will serve as the location of the election. Concerns that a “October surprise” would have an impact on the outcome of the election have also been dispelled by him to the extent that he has been successful.

His prediction was made at the beginning of Kamala Harris September by Dr. Lichtman, a professor at American University who is well-known for accurately predicting nine out of the last ten elections that have taken place in the United States.

Kamala Harris is famous for reliably predicting election results.

“The October surprise is one of the greatest myths in American politics,” Dr. Lichtman said in a CNN interview with Michael Smerconish. This is what Dr. Lichtman said during the discussion. I have never revised my prediction in any way in response to an October surprise.

This is because the keys assess the overall strength of the government that is currently in power rather than being impacted by the events that will transpire during the campaign.

A group of thirteen characteristics that Dr. Lichtman employs in order to assess the viability of each contender for the presidency is referred to as the “keys,” and the term “keys” is used to refer to the characteristics that are being evaluated.

As a result of the allegations that he made in September, it appears that Kamala Harris is in a stronger position to gain eight of the thirteen keys, whereas Trump has only been able to get three of them.

The assertion that Dr. Lichtman made regarding the insignificance of “October surprises” is supported by precedents that have been formed throughout the course of history.

Such precedents have been established. According to a video that was taken from the television show “Access Hollywood” in the time leading up to the election in 2016, it was revealed that President Trump had made things that were not proper from a female perspective. Over the course of the weeks leading up to the election, the recording was accomplished.

In spite of the ramifications that led to Trump’s defeat, Lichtman predicted, based on his primary system, that Trump would ultimately emerge victorious in the election. This forecast was based on the assumption that Trump would emerge victorious in the election.

Over the course of his forty years of experience, Lichtman has never altered a prediction, and he does not intend to do so at this time.

Lightman won’t change Kamala Harris’ prediction.

According to the scholar, who identifies himself as a registered Democrat, he has properly predicted the outcome of each and every presidential election that has taken place since 1984. He claims that he has done this for every single election. It has been his experience that he has done this for each and every election.

On the other hand, there are members of the skeptical community who point out inconsistencies in his reasoning over the course of his career, particularly in relation to the elections that took place in the years 2000 and 2016.

Furthermore, Dr. Lichtman emphasized the need for voter involvement, despite the fact that he did not deviate from his unshakable prediction of Kamala Harris outcome regarding the election. The crowd was given his counsel, which was as follows: “The outcome is up to you, so get out there and vote,” he said.

Kamala Harris has a two-percentage point advantage in multi-candidate surveys, according to the most current Real Clear Politics aggregate, which displays the results of the survey.

This is in line with the findings of current polling data, which indicate that Mrs. Harris is at a tiny advantage over Donald Trump in the race for the presidency.

SOUREC: NDTV

SEE ALSO:

Scientists Awarded MicroRNA The Nobel Prize in Medicine.

US Inflation will Comfort a Fed Focused on Labor Markets.

According to a regulatory filing, the chief operating officer of Truth Social’s parent company has resigned, and the company is required by a court judgment to hand over nearly 800,000 shares to one of its investors.

COO Andrew Northwall resigned from Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. late last month, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, and the business intends to “transition his duties internally.” There were no further details revealed about the resignation. He began working for the company in December 2021, according to his LinkedIn page.

The SEC filing also stated that a Delaware court determined last month that 785,825 Trump Media shares must be given to ARC Global Investments II. Both parties have been at odds over how many shares ARC was entitled to following Trump Media’s merger with Digital World Acquisition Corp. The court stated that ARC and Trump Media might submit an appeal within 30 days of its final order.

Chief Operating Officer Of Truth Social’s Parent Company Resigns

Trump Media operates the social media site Truth Social, which Trump founded after being barred from Twitter and Facebook following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Based in Sarasota, Florida, the company has been losing money and striving to increase revenue. According to regulatory documents, it lost approximately $58.2 million last year and generated only $4.1 million in revenue.

Some market experts consider Trump Media shares to be a meme stock, which is a term used to describe equities that become popular online and skyrocket in value, much exceeding what traditional analysis suggests. The stock has fluctuated for several months, with trading primarily driven by individual investors, who are often considered less skilled than day traders.

Late last month, Trump Media’s stock plunged to its lowest level ever on the first trading day when its largest shareholder, former President Donald Trump, was allowed to sell his position in the firm behind the Truth Social platform.

Chief Operating Officer Of Truth Social’s Parent Company Resigns

Trump Media’s shares, known as TMTG, began trading publicly in March. When the business debuted on the Nasdaq in March, its shares reached a high of $79.38.

Trump Media & Technology shares gained marginally to $16.20 before the market opened on Friday.

SOURCE | AP